Don’t Buy a House in These 10 US Cities: Growing Populations and Overcrowding

Population growth is usually a good indication that a city is desirable. People tend to move to areas offering more job opportunities, affordable housing and cost of living, good schools or other amenities. But is population growth a sign you should buy a house and put down some roots? Not always.

In a 2017 article published by Governing, Paul Gottlieb, an economist at Rutgers University, argued that metropolitan areas with stable or slow-growing populations are likely to have greater economic prosperity. According to Gottlieb, data suggests that mayors shouldn’t use population increase as a guaranteed route to a better economy.

Check Out: 6 Best Florida Suburbs To Buy Property in the Next 5 Years, According to Real Estate Agents

Learn More: How To Get Rich in Real Estate Starting With Just $1,000

Population growth also leads to overcrowding and increased housing demand, infrastructure and services. In terms of real estate, population growth is a crucial factor in determining how home prices in a given market will perform, according to Business Insider.

If more people move to a city than leave, housing demand increases and drives up home prices. Home price appreciation is great news if you’re a homeowner, but it makes buying a home slightly harder. In a recent report, Exploding Topics identified the fastest-growing U.S. metro areas using data from the U.S. Census Bureau and related sources.

Here are the top 10 on the list of where you shouldn’t buy a home to avoid an overcrowded market.

1. Austin, Texas

  • Current population (city): 961,855
  • Current population (metro): 2,173,804
  • Percentage growth (metro): 25.84%

Learn More: 6 Best Cities To Buy Property in the Next 5 Years, According to Real Estate Agents

2. Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina

  • Current population (city): 467,665 / 174,762
  • Current population (metro): ​​1,362,997
  • Percentage growth (metro): 19.84%

3. Orlando, Florida

  • Current population (city): 307,573
  • Current population (metro): 2,560,260
  • Percentage growth (metro): 19.69%

4. Charleston-North Charleston, South Carolina

  • Current population (city): 143,151
  • Current population (metro): 790,955
  • Percentage growth (metro): 18.5%

5. Houston, Texas

  • Current population (city): 2,304,580
  • Current population (metro): 6,979,613
  • Percentage growth (metro): 17.36%

6. Sarasota-Bradenton Metro Area, Florida

  • Current population (city): 434,006 / 50,698
  • Current population (metro): 821,613
  • Percentage growth (metro): 16.81%

7. San Antonio, Texas

  • Current population (city): 1,434,625
  • Current population (metro): 2,510,211
  • Percentage growth (metro): 16.59%

8. Dallas-Forth Worth, Texas

  • Current population (city): 1,304,379 / 918,915
  • Current population (metro): 7,451,858
  • Percentage growth (metro): 16.58%

9. Phoenix, Arizona

  • Current population (city): 1,608,139
  • Current population (metro): 4,860,338
  • Percentage growth (metro): 15.61%

10. Nashville, Tennessee

  • Current population (city): 715,884
  • Current population (metro): 1,904,186
  • Percentage growth (metro): 15.35%

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Don’t Buy a House in These 10 US Cities: Growing Populations and Overcrowding

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

More Related Articles

Info icon

This data feed is not available at this time.

Data is currently not available

Sign up for the TradeTalks newsletter to receive your weekly dose of trading news, trends and education. Delivered Wednesdays.