Looking at the sectors faring worst as of midday Tuesday, shares of Materials companies are underperforming other sectors, showing a 2.0% loss. Within that group, Albemarle Corp. (Symbol: ALB) and Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold (Symbol: FCX) are two large stocks that are lagging, showing a loss of 12.1% and 6.1%, respectively. Among the high volume ETFs, one ETF closely following materials stocks is the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLB), which is down 1.7% on the day, and up 8.55% year-to-date. Albemarle Corp., meanwhile, is down 15.36% year-to-date, and Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold is up 16.27% year-to-date. Combined, ALB and FCX make up approximately 5.8% of the underlying holdings of XLB.
The next worst performing sector is the Services sector, showing a 0.9% loss. Among large Services stocks, Fox Corp (Symbol: FOX) and Fox Corp (Symbol: FOXA) are the most notable, showing a loss of 5.4% and 5.4%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Services stocks is the iShares U.S. Consumer Services ETF (IYC), which is down 0.3% in midday trading, and up 9.53% on a year-to-date basis. Fox Corp, meanwhile, is up 18.65% year-to-date, and Fox Corp is up 22.82% year-to-date. Combined, FOX and FOXA make up approximately 0.3% of the underlying holdings of IYC.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Tuesday. As you can see, three sectors are up on the day, while four sectors are down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Energy | +1.0% |
| Utilities | +0.9% |
| Healthcare | +0.3% |
| Financial | 0.0% |
| Technology & Communications | -0.0% |
| Consumer Products | -0.3% |
| Industrial | -0.7% |
| Services | -0.9% |
| Materials | -2.0% |
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
Also see:
ETFs Holding MAR
ORIC Average Annual Return
ANIP Price Target
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
