The journey
Nasdaq Solovis had been prototyping risk algorithms and code in collaboration with GTF for much of 2019. An iterative approach was used where features such as scenario analysis and risk proxies for illiquid assets were developed and then beta-tested with GTF. But then as a front-end for its risk application was still under development, the COVID-19 crisis hit. GTF didn’t have time to wait for the final product – it needed risk answers right then.
For those stressful several weeks, Solovis delivered GTF regular risk reports using its already developed risk engine code and Excel spreadsheets. These reports included up-to-date information on its portfolio’s volatility, factor exposures, major risk contributors, and the projected impact of further economic shocks.
“No one is ever truly 100% prepared for the type of event that occurred in February and March of 2020,” Crist said. “This was especially true as we were not quite at a final stage of having the risk platform up and running. Regardless of how far along the project was, the data was vital to the circumstances. It was crucial to understand how our portfolio was positioned, both as the market sold off and in the subsequent rebound.”
This trial by fire of both GTF’s risk management process and Solovis’ new risk software helped GTF make the moves it needed to emerge unscathed from the market volatility. And it turned out to be the best proof of concept Solovis Risk Analytics could have asked for. Over this period, Solovis proved that it could produce insightful risk analyses on an on-demand basis. And these analyses could then be used to help inform the investment process during the worst and most stressful of times.
In the fall of 2020, Solovis completed the front-end of the new Risk Analytics application. Fully integrated with Solovis Portfolio Analytics and accessible on-demand, Georgia Tech Foundation could finally move off spreadsheets for good.
“The events in February and March of 2020 ended up pushing the project along quicker. It provided great fact checking for the parameters and proxies we were assigning to different parts of our portfolio. We were going through a live stress scenario that we could use to compare to what we were seeing in the hypothetical scenarios in Solovis Risk Analytics. Calibrating the model to the true output occurring in markets allowed us to ultimately gain confidence in the data going forward.”