Late-breaking data presented at AF Symposium 2025 highlight key Boston Scientific therapies for management of patients with atrial fibrillation

Published

First phase of ADVANTAGE AF clinical trial achieves safety and effectiveness endpoints for treatment of drug-resistant, symptomatic, persistent atrial fibrillation with the FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation System

Sub-analysis from OPTION clinical trial highlights consistent safety and efficacy outcomes with the WATCHMAN FLX™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device post cardiac ablation in both concomitant and sequential procedures

MARLBOROUGH, Mass., Jan. 16, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX) today announced data supporting the use of the FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) System* and the WATCHMAN FLX™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) Device, respectively, during a late-breaking science session at AF Symposium 2025.

Boston Scientific Corporation (PRNewsFoto/Boston Scientific Corporation) (PRNewsFoto/Boston Scientific Corporation)

ADVANTAGE AF clinical study

Currently, the FARAPULSE PFA System is approved for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients who have paroxysmal AF, an irregular heartbeat that occurs occasionally and typically spontaneously resolves back to normal rhythm. The ADVANTAGE AF study examined use of the FARAPULSE PFA System for both PVI and posterior wall ablation (PWA) in patients who have persistent AF, where individuals experience an irregular or rapid heartbeat that lasts longer than seven days and which represent 25% of all AF cases.1 The prospective, single arm trial included 260 patients enrolled at 43 global sites who were drug intolerant to at least one Class I/III anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD).

Key findings from the study through 12 months included:

  • The primary safety endpoint – defined as serious adverse events related to either the use of an ablation catheter or the ablation procedure within seven days of the primary procedure and pulmonary vein stenosis or atrio-esophageal fistula out to 12 months – was met with a 2.3% event rate.
  • The primary effectiveness endpoint – defined as freedom from AF, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, re-ablation, cardioversion and use of a new or escalated dose of Class I/III AAD or amiodarone – was met at 63.5%.
  • The symptomatic AF recurrence-free rate was 85.3% and observationally, among physicians that performed three or more procedures, the symptomatic recurrence-free rate increased to 91.8%.
  • There were no reported incidences of stroke, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula or major access complications.

"In addition to the positive safety and efficacy outcomes achieved in the ADVANTAGE AF study, a significant number of patients were able to discontinue AADs as well as see greater improvements in quality of daily life," said Vivek Reddy, M.D.**, director of electrophysiology, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, New York and study principal investigator. "As the population of patients living with AF continues to grow, data from trials such as ADVANTAGE AF further support the paradigm shift to PFA as a treatment for patients who are living with persistent and other complex forms of AF."

OPTION trial sub-analysis

The late-breaking session also included a prespecified sub-analysis from the OPTION clinical trial that built upon the positive primary endpoint results presented at the American Heart Association 2024 meeting and published in The New England Journal of Medicine.2 In line with the overall 36-month outcomes from this first head-to-head study of the WATCHMAN FLX device and direct oral anticoagulants (95% DOAC, 5% warfarin), the sub-analysis of 1,600 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent a device implantation either concomitantly or sequentially (90-180 days post ablation) demonstrated:

  • Consistent with the previously presented primary safety and efficacy endpoint data presented in November 2024, concomitant LAAC with the WATCHMAN FLX device following an ablation demonstrated a statistically significant 44% reduction in non-procedural bleeding outcomes compared to OAC at 36 months (8.0% vs. 13.3%; p=0.02) and similar efficacy outcomes (7.0% vs. 6.7% p=0.91), with the primary efficacy endpoint defined as all-cause death, stroke or systemic embolism.
  • Also consistent with the previously presented primary safety and efficacy endpoint data, sequential LAAC with the WATCHMAN FLX device following an ablation demonstrated a statistically significant 62% reduction in non-procedural bleeding outcomes compared to OAC at 36 months (8.8% vs. 21.5%; p

    The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story

BSX