Financial Advisors

Will We See a 'September Effect' in 2020?

  • As is discussed almost every year, September has historically been the most disappointing month for the US stock market
  • So far, it looks like this September could also disappoint. The previous 94 Septembers have lost 0.7% on average
  • The “September Effect” is mostly happenstance, but this time a stock market bubble makes a loss more likely

Other observers and I have written about the “September Effect” which is the history of disappointing returns on US stocks in the month of September. We’ve just come through two of the better months – July and August – with good results and now September has disappointed so far. Consequently, someone is going to remind everyone about the September Effect, and I thought I would be among the first. Will the rest of this month bring more of the same? How about the rest of the year?

 The following table gives the details. If we see a repeat of the worst September ever that occurred in 1931, the September 2020 stock market would lose 29.7%, but based on history we’d expect a 0.7% loss.

Best and worst returns by month

The following graphs show some of the key data in the above table.

Average returns by month
Monthly S&P 500 return ranges

Looking beyond September

But it’s not just the “September Effect” that threatens stock prices. By most measures, stocks are currently awfully expensive. They were expensive before the pandemic struck and have continued to become even richer despite the pandemic’s economic impacts, leading many to call it a bubble. For example, the following measures of expensiveness are at historic highs.

Price/earnings ratio is one measure for estimating expensiveness. The historically “fair” price for one dollars of earnings has been about $16 – the average P/E ratio is 16. Viewed another way, one hundred dollars of investment has historically bought $6.25 of annual earnings (the reciprocal of the P/E ratio). In the past when P/Es have risen to multiples of the average, stock markets have subsequently crashed. As shown in the following, the US stock market is currently priced 35 times earnings, more than twice the average P/E. One hundred dollars today buys $2.86 of annual earnings. Some argue that this is fair because interest rates are near zero. But if you buy this argument it means the Fed is manipulating stock prices by manipulating bond prices.

Shiller PE ratio

Source: Standard & Poors

Looking to the far right of the graph, we see that the growth bubble burst in 2000, then recovered only to be slammed by the housing bubble of 2008, and then the 2010s drove up multiples to 35 coming into the decade of the 2020s. Optimists explain that current multiples are justified by the huge success of the FAANG stocks – Facebook, Apple Amazon, Netflix and Google. These stocks were thriving in the 2010s and got a big boost recently with the pandemic. They currently comprise 23% of the S&P 500’s total capitalization.

We’re being told that the “valuation system” for these FAANG stocks is the “sky that trees grow to” we had in the 1990s growth bubble. Apple is a prime example, having just reached a market value of $2 trillion. As shown in the following, if Apple were a stock market it would be the 7th largest market in the world on a par with the stock market of Canada. Do you think this a “fair” price? Why? Might this September remedy this pricing?

Apple is the 7th biggest "country," tied with Canada

Source: Trading Hours.com

Warren Buffet has popularized another valuation system. When the value of the US stock market exceeds GDP, it is expensive. This measure has successfully signaled market crashes in the past and is currently at a 180% all-time high. The average ratio is 80%, so we’re currently more than twice average.

Buffett's expensive market rule

Source: GuruFocus

The Buffet measure has never been higher. A return back to the 80% norm requires much more than an increase in GDP as the economy recovers.

Conclusion

The “September Effect” is largely folklore / happenstance but this time it could be reality. What do you see happening?

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Ron Surz

Ronald J. Surz is Chief investment Officer of Glidepath Wealth Management and President of Target Date Solutions (TDS). GlidePath manages Personalized Target Date Portfolios for individual investors, primarily in IRAs. TDS manages commingled Target Date Funds for 401(k) plans. An industry veteran, Ron started his consulting career with A.G. Becker in the 1970s and formed his own consulting firms in the 1990s. With Masters degrees in Applied Mathematics and Finance, Ron publishes regularly and has developed leading edge technologies like the patented Safe Landing Glide Path® tracked by the SMART Funds® Target Date Index.

Read Ron's Bio