Key Points
The Trade Desk's Q1 revenue rose 11.9% year over year, beating analyst expectations.
Higher taxes and platform spending pressured the bottom line this quarter.
The ongoing Publicis conflict remains a concern for investors watching The Trade Desk.
- 10 stocks we like better than The Trade Desk ›
Shares of The Trade Desk (NASDAQ: TTD) had a rough morning today. The digital advertising specialist reported Q1 2026 earnings on Thursday evening, beating Wall Street's revenue targets but falling short on the bottom line. As a result, The Trade Desk's stock opened 11.7% lower, climbing back to a 4.8% price drop as of this writing at 10:50 a.m. ET.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Q1 2026 by the numbers
First-quarter sales rose 11.9% year over year, landing at $689 million. Adjusted earnings fell from $0.33 to $0.29 per diluted share. The analyst consensus had called for earnings near $0.32 per share on top-line sales of roughly $680 million, so it was a mixed bag. That being said, the results exceeded management's guidance targets across the board.
Management celebrated strong sales despite heavy macroeconomic headwinds, including tariff-burdened advertiser budgets and geopolitical turbulence. The soft earnings resulted from a larger income tax bill than usual, alongside heavy spending on platform operations.
That shouldn't be a surprise, though. The Trade Desk's quarterly filings always remind investors that the company invests in long-term growth, not quick wins. Rising operating costs are always on the table.
Putting the financials in context
Investors weren't inspired by The Trade Desk's guidance for the next period. Revenue should rise at least 8% year over year to a minimum of $750 million, and adjusted EBITDA profits were targeted at $260 million, down from $270 million in the year-ago period. The Trade Desk has a long history of setting modest targets and beating them, as it did in this week's Q1 report, but the shrinking profit target is still noteworthy.
Furthermore, people worry about the company's conflict with Publicis (OTC: PUBGY), a massive advertising group with French roots. The Trade Desk's CEO, Jeff Green, wants to put that drama to rest.
"I think that has been overdramatized and I am hopeful that we are nearing the end of this public discussion, so I am hopeful that our discussion today puts an end to it," he said on the earnings call. "We continue to have great dialogue with Publicis about the next chapter of our partnership. Our negotiations are ongoing."
Publicis has accounted for several billion dollars of The Trade Desk's revenues over the last decade, so losing that relationship would sting. Investors are still hoping for a clear end to it.
Should you buy stock in The Trade Desk right now?
Before you buy stock in The Trade Desk, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and The Trade Desk wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $475,926!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,296,608!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 981% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 205% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 8, 2026.
Anders Bylund has positions in The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
