What happened
Shares of MicroVision (NASDAQ: MVIS) fell 15% Friday after the laser technology company delivered disappointing first-quarter results.
So what
MicroVision's revenue plunged 67% year over year to $0.5 million. It also generated a larger net loss of $6.2 million, or $0.04 per share, compared to a loss of $4.9 million in the year-ago period. Wall Street had expected revenue of $0.6 million and a net loss per share of $0.03.
MicroVision's stock price reversed track Friday. Image source: Getty Images.
CEO Sumit Sharma said MicroVision's development program was on track to deliver long-range lidar sensors for sale as early as the third quarter. The company says its sensors can help to improve the automotive market's autonomous driving capabilities.
Sharma also touted MicroVision's balance sheet strength. A series of share sales helped it end the first quarter with more than $75 million in cash and investments.
Now what
MicroVision's share price soared earlier in the week after it became one of the most talked-about stocks on Reddit's popular WallStreetBets investing forum. But social media fame -- and its related volatility -- cuts both ways. When MicroVision's first-quarter performance fell short of the market's expectations, many of Reddit's traders bolted for the exits.
10 stocks we like better than Microvision
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Microvision wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
*Stock Advisor returns as of February 24, 2021
Joe Tenebruso has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
