Looking at the sectors faring best as of midday Wednesday, shares of Technology & Communications companies are outperforming other sectors, up 0.3%. Within that group, Palo Alto Networks, Inc (Symbol: PANW) and Uber Technologies Inc (Symbol: UBER) are two large stocks leading the way, showing a gain of 4.8% and 3.2%, respectively. Among technology ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLK), which is up 0.6% on the day, and down 1.16% year-to-date. Palo Alto Networks, Inc, meanwhile, is up 6.78% year-to-date, and Uber Technologies Inc is up 1.11% year-to-date. PANW makes up approximately 1.1% of the underlying holdings of XLK.
The next best performing sector is the Services sector, up 0.2%. Among large Services stocks, Meta Platforms Inc (Symbol: META) and Lennar Corp (Symbol: LEN) are the most notable, showing a gain of 3.6% and 3.2%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Services stocks is the iShares U.S. Consumer Services ETF (IYC), which is up 0.6% in midday trading, and down 0.99% on a year-to-date basis. Meta Platforms Inc, meanwhile, is up 4.60% year-to-date, and Lennar Corp is up 2.62% year-to-date. LEN makes up approximately 0.7% of the underlying holdings of IYC.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Wednesday. As you can see, four sectors are up on the day, while four sectors are down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Technology & Communications | +0.3% |
| Services | +0.2% |
| Healthcare | +0.2% |
| Industrial | +0.2% |
| Utilities | -0.0% |
| Financial | -0.1% |
| Materials | -0.3% |
| Consumer Products | -0.6% |
| Energy | -1.1% |
Also see:
Cheap Materials Stocks RKLB Options Chain
Top Ten Hedge Funds Holding PPC
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.