In afternoon trading on Wednesday, Energy stocks are the best performing sector, up 0.9%. Within the sector, APA Corp (Symbol: APA) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (Symbol: FANG) are two of the day's stand-outs, showing a gain of 3.4% and 2.6%, respectively. Among energy ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLE), which is up 0.9% on the day, and down 6.01% year-to-date. APA Corp, meanwhile, is down 32.22% year-to-date, and Diamondback Energy, Inc., is down 19.79% year-to-date. Combined, APA and FANG make up approximately 2.3% of the underlying holdings of XLE.
The next best performing sector is the Utilities sector, losing just 0.5%. Among large Utilities stocks, Eversource Energy (Symbol: ES) and Duke Energy Corp (Symbol: DUK) are the most notable, showing a gain of 1.1% and 0.4%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Utilities stocks is the Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU), which is down 0.6% in midday trading, and up 2.80% on a year-to-date basis. Eversource Energy, meanwhile, is up 3.42% year-to-date, and Duke Energy Corp is up 13.26% year-to-date. Combined, ES and DUK make up approximately 9.7% of the underlying holdings of XLU.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Wednesday. As you can see, one sector is up on the day, while eight sectors are down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Energy | +0.9% |
| Utilities | -0.5% |
| Healthcare | -1.0% |
| Financial | -1.2% |
| Consumer Products | -1.3% |
| Materials | -1.3% |
| Industrial | -1.9% |
| Services | -2.2% |
| Technology & Communications | -2.7% |
10 ETFs With Stocks That Insiders Are Buying »
Also see:
XMPT Average Annual Return
WEN Average Annual Return
MTG Dividend History
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
