Looking at the sectors faring best as of midday Wednesday, shares of Consumer Products companies are outperforming other sectors, up 0.9%. Within that group, LKQ Corp (Symbol: LKQ) and PepsiCo Inc (Symbol: PEP) are two large stocks leading the way, showing a gain of 5.1% and 3.3%, respectively. Among consumer products ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (Symbol: IYK), which is up 0.5% on the day, and up 3.92% year-to-date. LKQ Corp, meanwhile, is down 16.20% year-to-date, and PepsiCo Inc is up 1.92% year-to-date. PEP makes up approximately 8.8% of the underlying holdings of IYK.
The next best performing sector is the Industrial sector, higher by 0.8%. Among large Industrial stocks, GE Vernova Inc (Symbol: GEV) and Axon Enterprise Inc (Symbol: AXON) are the most notable, showing a gain of 14.6% and 3.4%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Industrial stocks is the Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI), which is up 0.8% in midday trading, and up 18.40% on a year-to-date basis. GE Vernova Inc, meanwhile, is up 118.09% year-to-date, and Axon Enterprise Inc, is down 4.92% year-to-date. Combined, GEV and AXON make up approximately 5.2% of the underlying holdings of XLI.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Wednesday. As you can see, seven sectors are up on the day, while two sectors are down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Consumer Products | +0.9% |
| Industrial | +0.8% |
| Healthcare | +0.7% |
| Materials | +0.5% |
| Financial | +0.4% |
| Services | +0.3% |
| Technology & Communications | +0.1% |
| Energy | -0.2% |
| Utilities | -0.4% |
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
Also see:
Financial Dividend Stock List
JWN Stock Predictions
Funds Holding NXG
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
