In afternoon trading on Wednesday, Utilities stocks are the worst performing sector, showing a 0.5% loss. Within that group, PG&E Corp (Symbol: PCG) and Sempra (Symbol: SRE) are two large stocks that are lagging, showing a loss of 1.8% and 1.3%, respectively. Among utilities ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLU), which is down 0.6% on the day, and up 25.81% year-to-date. PG&E Corp, meanwhile, is up 8.32% year-to-date, and Sempra is up 12.58% year-to-date. Combined, PCG and SRE make up approximately 8.0% of the underlying holdings of XLU.
The next worst performing sector is the Materials sector, showing a 0.3% loss. Among large Materials stocks, Albemarle Corp. (Symbol: ALB) and Avery Dennison Corp (Symbol: AVY) are the most notable, showing a loss of 3.3% and 3.1%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Materials stocks is the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB), which is down 0.5% in midday trading, and up 9.89% on a year-to-date basis. Albemarle Corp., meanwhile, is down 39.07% year-to-date, and Avery Dennison Corp is up 6.85% year-to-date. Combined, ALB and AVY make up approximately 2.7% of the underlying holdings of XLB.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Wednesday. As you can see, seven sectors are up on the day, while two sectors are down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Technology & Communications | +0.5% |
| Consumer Products | +0.4% |
| Services | +0.4% |
| Energy | +0.3% |
| Healthcare | +0.2% |
| Financial | +0.2% |
| Industrial | +0.2% |
| Materials | -0.3% |
| Utilities | -0.5% |
10 ETFs With Stocks That Insiders Are Buying »
Also see:
AAOI market cap history
BCAB Average Annual Return
GGN Dividend History
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
