VCIT

Vanguard's VCIT Delivers More Income Than VGIT. Is the Credit Risk Worth It?

Key Points

The Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (NASDAQ:VCIT) and the Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (NASDAQ:VGIT) both keep costs low and target moderate-duration bonds, but VCIT delivers a higher yield and takes on more credit risk through its corporate debt holdings, while VGIT focuses exclusively on U.S. Treasuries and shows less historical drawdown.

Both VCIT and VGIT aim to provide steady income with moderate interest rate exposure, but they differ in their approach—one leans into investment-grade corporate bonds, the other stays strictly with U.S. government debt. This comparison covers cost, yield, performance, risk, and portfolio composition to help investors weigh their options.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVGITVCIT
IssuerVanguardVanguard
Expense ratio0.03%0.03%
1-yr return (as of 2026-01-30)6.6%8.8%
Dividend yield3.8%4.6%
Beta0.821.10
AUM$44.6 billion$61.8 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

Both funds are among the most affordable in the bond ETF space, each charging just 0.03% annually, but VCIT offers a meaningfully higher yield, which may appeal to those seeking a bigger income stream without added expense.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVGITVCIT
Max drawdown (5 y)(15.04%)(20.56%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$867$872

What's inside

VCIT invests in a broad mix of high-quality, investment-grade corporate bonds. Its top positions include Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), United States Treasury Note/Bond, and Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), each making up a small slice of the portfolio. The fund has been operating for over 16 years and maintains a pure fixed income allocation, with no sector quirks or leverage involved.

By contrast, VGIT sticks exclusively to U.S. Treasury securities, with its entire allocation in government notes and bonds. Its top holdings are various Treasury issues, and it carries a smaller number of positions, offering a straightforward approach for those seeking government-only exposure and minimal credit risk.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Both of these Vanguard funds hold intermediate-term bonds maturing in 5-10 years, but they're lending to completely different borrowers. VCIT buys investment-grade corporate debt from blue chip companies like major banks, utilities, and industrial giants. VGIT sticks exclusively to U.S. Treasury bonds, lending directly to the federal government.

That borrower difference drives everything else. VCIT delivered nearly 9% returns in the last year with a 4.6% yield, compensating investors for taking corporate credit risk—the chance that even well-rated companies could struggle to repay if economic conditions deteriorate. VGIT returned around 7% with a 3.7% yield, offering lower income but ironclad safety since Treasuries carry the full backing of the U.S. government. During market volatility, Treasuries typically rally as investors flee to safety, while corporate bonds can wobble when recession fears spike.

VCIT makes sense for investors comfortable accepting corporate credit risk to boost income in their bond allocation. VGIT is a better choice for conservative investors prioritizing capital preservation and seeking the stability bonds offer during downturns, even if it means sacrificing nearly a percentage point of annual yield for government-guaranteed safety.

Should you buy stock in Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Intermediate-Termorate Bond ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Intermediate-Termorate Bond ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Intermediate-Termorate Bond ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $443,299!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,136,601!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 914% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 195% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of February 7, 2026.

Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Sara Appino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Tags

More Related Articles

Info icon

This data feed is not available at this time.

Data is currently not available

Sign up for the TradeTalks newsletter to receive your weekly dose of trading news, trends and education. Delivered Wednesdays.