A U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) official said blockchain deserves the full protection of antitrust law because it has the potential to mount an effective challenge to monopolies.
- In a speech published last week, Makan Delrahim, assistant attorney general at the DoJâs Antitrust Division, said blockchain could prevent or limit the concentration of market power, improving competition in a whole host of industries.
- He said: â[I]t is of utmost importance that we prevent competitive abuses in markets where blockchain may offer consumers and business lower-cost or higher-value options.â
- Delrahim said the Antitrust Division would try to understand how businesses are implementing blockchain solutions as well as the possible effects it could have on market competition.
- He also said the division would try to anticipate how incumbents could try to stop or limit the potential of blockchain solutions so they can maintain market-dominant positions.
- This could include using private blockchains to deny rivals access to crucial market infrastructure, he said.
- Thibault Schrepel, an assistant professor in Antitrust Law at Utrecht University School of Law and faculty affiliate at Standford Universityâs CodeX Center, told CoinDesk the antitrust chief could be subtly hinting that blockchain could disrupt big tech monopolies.
- In his speech, Delrahim added that critical questions remain, such as whether existing intermediaries have any place at all within a blockchain-based market system.
- Itâs also possible, the antitrust chief said, that the role of blockchain could change over time as it faces further mainstream adoption.
See also: Blockchain Code Can Fill In When Antitrust Law Fails
Related Stories
- Bitfinex Invests in Derivatives Exchange Built With Bitcoinâs Lightning Network
- Tech Mahindra to Offer Blockchain Solutions on AWS
- Augustâs Bitcoin Rally Led to Record Crypto Derivatives Volumes: Report
- Bitcoin Should Be Regulated Like Stocks in India, Says Think Tank Founder
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.