Looking at the sectors faring best as of midday Tuesday, shares of Services companies are outperforming other sectors, up 0.8%. Within that group, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc (Symbol: WBA) and Alphabet Inc (Symbol: GOOGL) are two large stocks leading the way, showing a gain of 20.3% and 5.3%, respectively. Among the largest ETFs, one ETF closely following services stocks is the iShares U.S. Consumer Services ETF (Symbol: IYC), which is up 0.4% on the day, and up 33.29% year-to-date. Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, meanwhile, is down 55.40% year-to-date, and Alphabet Inc is up 32.65% year-to-date.
The next best performing sector is the Consumer Products sector, higher by 0.1%. Among large Consumer Products stocks, Tesla Inc (Symbol: TSLA) and McCormick & Co Inc (Symbol: MKC) are the most notable, showing a gain of 4.6% and 2.0%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Consumer Products stocks is the iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK), which is up 0.2% in midday trading, and up 9.89% on a year-to-date basis. Tesla Inc, meanwhile, is up 64.06% year-to-date, and McCormick & Co Inc is up 21.09% year-to-date. MKC makes up approximately 0.9% of the underlying holdings of IYK.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Tuesday. As you can see, two sectors are up on the day, while seven sectors are down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Services | +0.8% |
| Consumer Products | +0.1% |
| Industrial | -0.1% |
| Energy | -0.1% |
| Healthcare | -0.3% |
| Financial | -0.5% |
| Utilities | -0.7% |
| Materials | -0.9% |
| Technology & Communications | -1.2% |
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
Also see:
GAL Videos
Institutional Holders of HFIN
SEV Split History
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
