In afternoon trading on Thursday, Energy stocks are the worst performing sector, showing a 0.9% loss. Within that group, APA Corp (Symbol: APA) and Halliburton Company (Symbol: HAL) are two of the day's laggards, showing a loss of 9.1% and 3.8%, respectively. Among energy ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLE), which is down 0.4% on the day, and up 13.74% year-to-date. APA Corp, meanwhile, is down 34.55% year-to-date, and Halliburton Company, is down 17.39% year-to-date. Combined, APA and HAL make up approximately 2.9% of the underlying holdings of XLE.
The next worst performing sector is the Financial sector, showing a 0.6% loss. Among large Financial stocks, JPMorgan Chase & Co (Symbol: JPM) and Citizens Financial Group Inc (Symbol: CFG) are the most notable, showing a loss of 3.9% and 3.6%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Financial stocks is the Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF), which is down 1.3% in midday trading, and up 31.39% on a year-to-date basis. JPMorgan Chase & Co, meanwhile, is up 42.31% year-to-date, and Citizens Financial Group Inc is up 45.56% year-to-date. Combined, JPM and CFG make up approximately 7.1% of the underlying holdings of XLF.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Thursday. As you can see, four sectors are up on the day, while three sectors are down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Technology & Communications | +1.0% |
| Services | +0.4% |
| Healthcare | +0.4% |
| Consumer Products | +0.2% |
| Utilities | -0.0% |
| Materials | 0.0% |
| Industrial | -0.1% |
| Financial | -0.6% |
| Energy | -0.9% |
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
Also see:
Analyst Least Favorites
ARAY Historical Stock Prices
NSTB Options Chain
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
