Abstract Tech

Prepare for California Climate Requirements: Insights from Legal, Policy, and Sustainability Experts

Written by Steve Vargas

Last updated as of September 3, 2025. This article includes insights from Nasdaq and external experts featured on Nasdaq’s recent webinar. It also provides links to additional CARB updates and proposals for the latest information.

California has adopted legislation that will require entities with annual total revenues greater than $500 million, and doing business in the state, to publish a climate-related financial risk report by January 1, 2026, and biannually thereafter. Later in the year, entities doing business in the state with annual total revenues greater than $1 billion will be required to begin reporting greenhouse gas emissions. Is your company prepared to meet these requirements?

California Climate Legislation: The Current Landscape

As the world’s fourth largest economy, California’s climate policies will add new layers of complexity for public and private reporting companies across the globe. To better understand the requirements, below is a breakdown of the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB-261) and Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB-253).

California Climate BillsSB-261SB-253
Required DisclosuresTask Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) or International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) based climate-related financial risk report. The first year will not require quantitative GHG or scenario analysis data, just qualitative discussion of climate-related risks (and opportunities) in line with the TCFD framework recommendations.Exact timeline for reporting still under discussion: Scope 1 and 2 proposed due date is June 30, 2026. Scope 3 disclosure required in 2027.
California Health and Safety Code Section**§ 38533§ 38532
What They Cover Qualitative metrics around impacts, risks, opportunities, and strategiesQuantitative metrics around GHG emissions 
ScopeCompanies with >$500 million annual revenue and doing business in California*Companies with >$1 billion annual revenue and doing business in California*
TimelineDisclose by January 1, 2026, and biannually thereafter for companies doing over $500 million in revenue. Report on Scope 1 and 2 FY2025 GHG emissions data during the 2026 reporting cycle, tentatively set for June 30, 2026. Scope 3 emissions reporting will take place in subsequent years.
Legal StatusStatute passed into law; No implementing legislation needed from the California Air Resources Board (CARB); CARB will provide FAQs and other guidance documentsStatute passed; Regulations still need to be developed by CARB
How to DiscloseClimate Risk Reports must be published on the company’s websiteCARB is explicitly required to develop regulations and indicated publication of drafts by the end of 2025

*CARB has yet to define “doing business in California” but have proposed leveraging the California Tax and Revenue Code approach.

**Section numbers are used in CARB’s FAQ documents

To speak to some of the complexities around the California climate laws, Nasdaq recently hosted a webinar, Climate Risk: How is California’s SB-261 impacting resilience & adaptation planning? Sustainability professionals Natasha Tuck, Director of Sustainability and ESG at Dolby and Michael Littenberg, Partner and Global Head of the ESG, CSR, Business and Human Rights Compliance Practice at Ropes at Ropes & Gray, shared their insights about the current legislative landscape.

What We Know About SB-261 and SB-253

According to a poll conducted during the webinar, only 30% of respondents considered themselves ‘very familiar’ with SB-261, with the majority (68%) indicating they were ‘somewhat familiar’ or ‘had heard of the regulation, but didn’t know the details.’ Companies are looking to better understand the California climate legislation requirements.

CARB has published FAQs and other documentation as of July 9, 2025, and held a public Workshop on August 21, 2025. On September 2, CARB released draft guidance on the minimum disclosure requirements of SB 261.

Key takeaways from the documentation include:

1. Updated timeline for regulation development. The materials reiterated that submissions for SB-253 will require 2025 data to be disclosed in 2026. According to the public session a date of June 30, 2026 has been proposed for SB-253, though CARB is still collecting feedback on the feasibility of this date. CARB is committed to developing a regulation by the end of the year, and the documentation noted that there will be further opportunities for public input.

2. Clarified expectations for posting Climate Risk Reports. Climate risk reports are still due on January 1, 2026. On December 1, CARB will post a public docket where covered entities should post the location of the public link for their first climate-related financial risk report under SB-261 – and will remain open until July 1, 2026.

3. Accepted reporting years for TCFD or other Climate Risk reports under SB-261. According to the documentation, there is a reasonable expectation that initial climate reports may cover FY 2023-2024 or FY 2024-2025, depending on the company.

4. Updates to fees and reporting numbers. The August session released a proposed structure for fees mandated in SB-261 and SB-253. Future hearings on December 11 and 12 of this year will finalize these structures. The proposed fees are as follows and are based on State and Dunn & Bradstreet data:

  • Annual fee for SB-253 entities: $3,106
  • Annual fee for SB-261 entities: $1,403
  • Reporting entities with more than $1B in revenue are subject to both fees
  • Fees will be adjusted for inflation and deficit in future years
  • CARB will initiate a process to validate the preliminary list of covered entities. This would be an annual fee required of every subsidiary in scope. Reporting entities with more than $1B in revenue would have to pay both fees every year.
California Climate ESG Gap Assessment

Barriers to Effective Sustainability Reporting 

In Nasdaq’s webinar poll, nearly 50% of respondents indicated the biggest compliance challenge they are facing is interpreting regulatory requirements, followed by data availability and quality and internal expertise (18%). Other potential hurdles for effective reporting include needing to comply with multiple policies and having to do so in a short period of time.

When asked if he thought the 2026 timeline was achievable for most companies, Littenberg said generally yes, as SB-261 is effectively a comply or explain statute. He paraphrased the requirements and indicated “If you haven't done all the work to report in full, you can explain the reporting gaps and what you're planning on doing to provide complete disclosures for the next reporting cycle.” 

How Companies Can Prepare for the Reporting Deadline

To stay on track to disclose in 2026, the webinar panelists agreed that having a clear compliance strategy with good oversight, defined roles and responsibilities, mapped milestones, and achievable goals will help companies deliver their reports on time and set a solid foundation for demonstrating future progress. They also agreed that it is important that everyone involved in reporting understands the statute, ensuring leaders and individual contributors manage their work appropriately.

Tuck shared that her team’s approach is to combine efforts and leverage their climate risk scenario analysis and financial impact work done in alignment with TCFD for SB-261 disclosures. The work companies may already be doing to prepare for CSRD, like improving data quality and processes, will also support teams in feeling more confident and prepared for disclosure. 

Tuck also recommended that companies condense timelines as much as possible and keep diligent records of traceable data. Beyond satisfying reporting requirements, accurate and verifiable data will be key in conversations with executives and future audits. Moreover, to help speed up data gathering and drafting, Tuck suggested leveraging technology that can help complete the bulk of the work for companies. Ultimately, she shared that “action is the antidote to anxiety” and teams shouldn’t let perfection be the enemy of progressing toward and meeting the deadline with their best effort.

For companies looking for additional guidance, CARB’s website provides the latest information. In addition, a gap assessment is another way companies can better understand their climate risks and reporting readiness for TCFD-aligned California disclosures by analyzing key themes like strategy, governance, risk management, and metrics.

The Right Partner and Technology Can Help Simplify Reporting

Today’s climate regulations are complicated, and the deadline is approaching fast. Together with solid data governance and sound reporting strategies, investing in the right sustainability solutions can help companies meet the SB-261 reporting deadline. In addition, engaging with the right partner can help teams assess their climate risks and improve their reporting strategies overtime. 

Nasdaq offers a suite of tools and advisory services to help companies navigate key compliance activities and adapt to evolving climate legislation: 

  • Nasdaq Metrio™ is Nasdaq’s end-to-end sustainability data management and reporting platform. Companies can collect granular sustainability data, automate survey workflows, and manage compliance with multinational taxonomies like TCFD, IFRS S2, SB-253, and SB-261, among others. Nasdaq Metrio can collect and disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, further enhancing data collection and workflow control.
  • The Nasdaq Sustainability & Climate Advisory team helps companies identify material climate-related financial risks and outline mitigative actions through research, expert interviews, and leadership workshops. Clients receive a Climate Risk & Opportunity Disclosure draft aligned with the TCFD framework and SB-261, which summarizes these insights and can support teams as they complete Climate Risk Assessments.

To learn more about how Nasdaq Sustainability Solutions supports companies throughout their sustainability journeys, visit our website or get in touch today.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the authors and panelists and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
 

California Climate ESG Assessment 2

Latest articles

Info icon

This data feed is not available at this time.

Data is currently not available