Credit: Shutterstock photoAmong the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. (Symbol: RGR), where a total of 982 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 98,200 underlying shares. That amounts to about 45.4% of RGR's average daily trading volume over the past month of 216,455 shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $52.50 strike call option expiring November 17, 2017 , with 223 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 22,300 underlying shares of RGR. Below is a chart showing RGR's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $52.50 strike highlighted in orange:
Juno Therapeutics Inc (Symbol: JUNO) saw options trading volume of 6,828 contracts, representing approximately 682,800 underlying shares or approximately 45.1% of JUNO's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.5 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $45 strike call option expiring November 17, 2017 , with 1,038 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 103,800 underlying shares of JUNO. Below is a chart showing JUNO's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $45 strike highlighted in orange:
And L Brands, Inc (Symbol: LB) saw options trading volume of 16,749 contracts, representing approximately 1.7 million underlying shares or approximately 45% of LB's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 3.7 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $47.50 strike call option expiring November 17, 2017 , with 8,539 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 853,900 underlying shares of LB. Below is a chart showing LB's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $47.50 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for RGR options , JUNO options , or LB options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
