Notable Wednesday Option Activity: FOLD, RLGY, CTAS

Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Amicus Therapeutics Inc (Symbol: FOLD), where a total of 20,416 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 2.0 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 49.7% of FOLD's average daily trading volume over the past month of 4.1 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $11 strike put option expiring April 20, 2018 , with 7,574 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 757,400 underlying shares of FOLD. Below is a chart showing FOLD's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $11 strike highlighted in orange:

Realogy Holdings Corp (Symbol: RLGY) saw options trading volume of 4,677 contracts, representing approximately 467,700 underlying shares or approximately 44.6% of RLGY's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.0 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $27.50 strike put option expiring January 18, 2019 , with 2,400 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 240,000 underlying shares of RLGY. Below is a chart showing RLGY's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $27.50 strike highlighted in orange:

And Cintas Corporation (Symbol: CTAS) saw options trading volume of 2,151 contracts, representing approximately 215,100 underlying shares or approximately 44.4% of CTAS's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 484,565 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $140 strike put option expiring October 20, 2017 , with 353 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 35,300 underlying shares of CTAS. Below is a chart showing CTAS's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $140 strike highlighted in orange:

For the various different available expirations for FOLD options , RLGY options , or CTAS options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.

Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.