Price Action vs. Geopolitical Fears
For weeks, Wall Street was obsessed with each and every headline out of the conflict in the Middle East between the United States and Iran. All it took was just one negative headline or escalation to send the Nasdaq lower by more than 1% and oil surging by more than 5%.
Currently, the strategically important Strait of Hormuz (which is vital to the energy trade) remains in a standstill due to a U.S. naval blockade, ensuring that crude oil prices remain elevated (crude oil is currently trading above $100). Until April, U.S. stocks fell whenever crude oil prices rose. However, over the past few weeks, an important change has occurred. U.S. stocks are decoupling from oil spikes and are no longer as reactive. To savvy market watchers, this change is critical and suggests that investors are refocusing on the economy’s fundamentals (which I will discuss later) and not geopolitics. The current price action mirrors historical geopolitical events. According to the data, geopolitical shocks tend to have a short-term impact on equity markets.
Image Source: Charles Schwab
AI CAPEX Spending is Snowballing
Last week marked the busiest week of earnings season and included reports from “Mag 7” tech giants such as Meta Platforms (META), Amazon (AMZN), and Alphabet (GOOGL). Although the initial reaction to earnings from Mag 7 stocks was mixed, capital expenditure (CAPEX) spending plans from big tech hyperscalers are far from slowing and was the true story. In fact, CAPEX spending is expected to soar from under $500 billion in 2025 to $646 billion in 2026 and a staggering $1 trillion or more in 2027!
Image Source: Apollo
Hyperscaler capex in 2026 will represent a staggering 2% of GDP in 2026 and is roughly the same size as the market cap of the stock markets in Belgium, Denmark, and Indonesia. In Q1, AI was already 75% of GDP growth. That trend is likely to continue. Meanwhile, hyperscaler spending is driving unfathomable demand for AI infrastructure. For instance, Microsoft (MSFT) recently paid ‘neocloud’ provider Nebius Group (NBIS) 40% of a multi-year contract upfront.
Don’t ‘Sell in May & Go Away’
Although the old Wall Street adage that warns investors to “Sell in May and go away” is catchy, historical data disproves it. According to Bluekurtic Market Insights (@Bluekurtic): “Since 1950, the S&P 500 has peaked for the year in May less than 3% of the time. Only 2 of the last 76 years saw SPX make its high in May: 1969 and 2015. Even better, the index has never peaked for the year in June either. Never.”
Image Source: Bluekurtic Market Insights
Bottom Line
While the headlines may remain focused on naval blockades and energy costs, the underlying market fundamentals and price action tell a far more optimistic story. The sheer scale of AI infrastructure demand- highlighted by massive upfront contracts and historic CAPEX plans- is providing a fundamental floor that geopolitics simply can’t crack.
Zacks' Research Chief Names "Stock Most Likely to Double"
Our team of experts has just released the 5 stocks with the greatest probability of gaining +100% or more in the coming months. Of those 5, Director of Research Sheraz Mian highlights the one stock set to climb highest.
This top pick is a little-known satellite-based communications firm. Space is projected to become a trillion dollar industry, and this company's customer base is growing fast. Analysts have forecasted a major revenue breakout in 2025. Of course, all our elite picks aren't winners but this one could far surpass earlier Zacks' Stocks Set to Double like Hims & Hers Health, which shot up +209%.
Free: See Our Top Stock And 4 Runners UpAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
