SF

Interactive Brokers Unit Faces Fine for Naked Short Selling

Credit: Shutterstock photo

A unit of Interactive Brokers GroupIBKR , Interactive Brokers LLC, has been charged with violations of Regulation SHO and lack of proper supervisory measures. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") has imposed a penalty of $5.5 million on the company.

Regulation SHO was introduced in 2005 with an aim to prevent unethical traders from engaging in naked short selling practices. Further, per the regulation, companies need to either deliver the shares on settlement date or purchase them on failing to deliver. It also prohibits the execution or display of short sale in a "covered security" at a price that is less than the current national best bid when the price of the security has fallen by at least 10% in a single day.

Per FINRA's findings, Interactive Brokers LLC's internal control systems did not comply with the requirements of Regulation SHO for a period of three years (ended June 2015). Moreover, the company chose to ignore several "red flags," indicated through internal audit, internal warnings from its employees, its own annual risk assessments and FINRA exam findings, indicating that its Regulation SHO supervisory systems and procedures were unreasonable.

Despite being aware of its shortcomings, Interactive's unit did not implement remedial measures until mid-2015. Due of this, it did not timely close-out more than 2,300 fails-to-deliver, and accepted and executed short orders in those securities without first borrowing the security about 28,000 times. Interactive also permitted the execution or display of more than 4,700 short sale orders in covered securities at a price less than or equal to the current national best bid. Though Interactive did not admit or deny to the charges, it consented to the entry of FINRA's findings.

FINRA's Executive Vice Presidentand Head of Enforcement, Susan Schroeder, said "Firms that are aware of deficiencies in their supervisory systems must promptly remediate them. In this case, the firm internally identified the problems, yet did not revise its supervisory systems for more than three years, creating the potential for negative impact to the markets and investor harm."

The company's shares have gained 4.7% over the past six months against 3.2% decline registered by the industry .

Some better-ranked stocks in the same industry are Moelis & Company MC , Evercore Inc. EVR and Stifel Financial Corporation SF , with each carrying a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here .

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Moelis & Company has been revised 5.6% upward for the current year in the last 60 days. The company's share price has rallied more than 10% in the past six months.

Evercore has witnessed nearly 1% upward earnings estimate revision for 2018 in the last 60 days. Its share price has increased more than 20% in the past six months.

Stifel Financial stock has gained more than 12% over the past six months. Its earnings estimates for 2018 have moved up 3.2% in the last 60 days.

The Hottest Tech Mega-Trend of All

Last year, it generated $8 billion in global revenues. By 2020, it's predicted to blast through the roof to $47 billion. Famed investor Mark Cuban says it will produce "the world's first trillionaires," but that should still leave plenty of money for regular investors who make the right trades early.

See Zacks' 3 Best Stocks to Play This Trend >>

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR): Free Stock Analysis Report

Moelis & Company (MC): Free Stock Analysis Report

Stifel Financial Corporation (SF): Free Stock Analysis Report

Evercore Inc (EVR): Free Stock Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

Zacks Investment Research

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

More Related Articles

Info icon

This data feed is not available at this time.

Data is currently not available

Sign up for the TradeTalks newsletter to receive your weekly dose of trading news, trends and education. Delivered Wednesdays.