LGIM Hero Banner

7 Key Takeaways from the 2023 Banking Crisis

Key Insights

  1. Banking Crisis Risks: The 2023 banking crisis highlighted the dangers of concentrated risk exposure and inadequate interest rate risk management.
  2. Liquidity and Balance Sheet Resilience: Strengthening liquidity stress testing, deposit analytics and balance sheet stress scenarios can help banks mitigate systemic vulnerabilities.
  3. Building Financial Strength: Proactive risk management, including robust treasury consolidation and advanced analytics, is vital for banks to withstand future economic shocks.

In early 2023, several financial institutions dramatically shuttered in just a few months. These closures comprised some of the largest bank collapses in U.S. history and constituted one of the most significant banking crises in decades.

While industry analysts have no shortage of opinions about the bank failures of 2023, financial institutions must stay pragmatic in their evaluation of root causes. The wise learn from their mistakes; the wiser learn from the mistakes of others. So, what are some of the key takeaways from the 2023 banking crisis?

 

Recapping the Fall


Let’s begin with a brief recap of events. In 2023, a string of financial institutions collapsed. The most prominent case was that of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), followed by the failure of Signature Bank a few days later and First Republic Bank in May of that year. Another institution, crypto lender Silvergate Bank, voluntarily wound down operations before the collapse of SVB.

The fallout was swift, with regulators stepping in to shut down the operations of several institutions. As an emergency measure, the Fed instituted the temporary Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), offering loans intended to bring stability to the banking system. Meanwhile, emergency deals were signed. First Citizen BancShares acquired SVB’s commercial banking operations, Signature’s former branches were purchased by New York Community Bancorp, and JP Morgan Chase took on the assets of First Republic Bank.

While a general meltdown was avoided, questions remain. Exactly what went wrong, and what measures can banks take to prevent a repeat?  
 

Examining the Root Causes


A lot of ink has been spilled as to why SVB, the most high-profile of the failed banks, collapsed. While no single factor explains all, here are some of the elements that contributed to its demise:

Overexposed/concentrated risk: SVB typically focused on a homogeneous set of depositors and borrowers, which propelled the bank’s growth in deposits and long-dated fixed-income securities.

Accumulation of unhedged interest-rate and liquidity-flight risks in the balance sheet: The Federal Reserve had raised interest rates multiple times in the preceding 12 months. Couple this with a U.S. regulatory framework that lacked sufficient incentives for banks to adjust their risk levels as well as substantial deductions from SVB’s available capital due to accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).

A downgraded economic context that caused depositors to withdraw cash to sustain their activities: This resulted in a first loss on bond portfolios that would, in isolation, have been manageable from a capital standpoint.

Rumors of imminent bankruptcy once the financial situation was communicated: This caused the stock to falter, initiating massive withdrawals and ultimately resulting in the bank selling its long-term, low-yield bonds that should ordinarily have been held to maturity.

A failed bailout: The lender of last resort refused the proposed solutions to cover the subsequent loss that exceeded the bank’s capital.
 

Unforeseen risks often pose the greatest threats. Strengthening risk management frameworks today can help financial institutions navigate uncertainties before they become crises.

Key Measures to Avoid a Repeat Event


Hindsight is always 20-20, but those who fail to learn the lessons of the past are more likely to repeat them. Here are seven measures which may help firms avoid a similar fate to that of Silicon Valley Bank: 

  1. Strengthen regulatory remediation: Matters Requiring Attention (MRA/MRIA) were left outstanding for extended periods of time. A heightened focus to proactively remediate this, in steady and measurable phases, is critical.
  2. Evaluate Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB): As mentioned, the rise in interest rates in the preceding year was a major contributing factor to SVB’s woes. Here, the economic value of equity (EVE) calculation is a simple but powerful measure to capture duration risk in the banking book, providing a clear picture of how a bank’s value might be affected in different interest rate scenarios.
  3. Improve liquidity stress testing (LST): Your LST is only as good as its modeling assumptions, which should rely on granular data that is properly sensitive to business dynamics. Aim to model idiosyncratic scenarios on the same, complete, and reconciled data used for FR 2052a reporting.
  4. Enhance deposit analytics: Gaining a better understanding of customer mobility is almost always smart. Place a heightened focus on account by ownership rights and capacity (ORC) that exceed the FDIC’s insurance limits.
  5. Treasury consolidation of trading and banking books: Bolster your ability to simulate interest-rate (IR) curve movements and recompute IR gaps and other IRRBB metrics with full drilldown. Such measures help enhance transparency and identify areas that require adjustments or pose higher risks.
  6. Balance sheet stress testing: To prepare for the unexpected, widen your scope of possibilities to identify vulnerabilities and ensure the bank has sufficient resilience to withstand shocks. Incorporate an expanded range of IR and FX rates and credit default swap (CDS) spreads in combination with behavioral models to create a more realistic view of how stress scenarios could unfold in practice.
  7. Advanced analytics for market and counterparty credit risk: Implement enterprise-wide stress scenarios, calculating risk metrics such as value at risk (VaR) and potential future exposure (PFE), enforcing limits, and accounting for the financial impact of changing market conditions, including valuations adjustments (XVA) driven by rising credit risk (e.g., CDS spreads).

Tools and approaches like those outlined help construct a comprehensive framework for liquidity risk management in complex, fast-moving financial environments.
 

Mend The Roof While the Sun Shines


Sometimes the biggest risks are those you don’t see coming. As financial institutions think about ways to manage liability and meet regulatory requirements, trusted treasury management solutions can help give you an edge.

Whether it’s simulating the impact of interest-rate changes on assets and liabilities or consolidating risk data across departments and geographies, the right data at the right time can help stave off the kinds of perils brought into sharp relief by the 2023 banking crisis.

 


Optimize Your Risk and Regulatory Strategy

Stay ahead of evolving risk and regulatory challenges with insights on liquidity stress testing, treasury analytics and more. Explore our market-leading resources hub to learn how Nasdaq AxiomSL can help.

Explore Resources

Jump to Topic

Get started with Nasdaq

Schedule a Demo

Interested in Nasdaq's cutting-edge Nasdaq AxiomSL solution that simplifies a complex regulatory landscape?Complete this form to get in touch with our team. 

Recommended For You

Regulatory News

FDIC Sets a New Standard for Custodial Account Reporting

Regulatory Technology

Nasdaq AxiomSL

Future-proof your risk and regulatory reporting with an intelligent data management and analytics platform.

Learn More ->

Latest articles

Info icon

This data feed is not available at this time.

Data is currently not available