
Constructive Conflict Builds Credibility
Today, we have a ringside seat to governance in action. Were all the events resulting from COVID-19 foreseeable? No. But we were warned. Bill Gates’ 2015 TED Talk, “The next outbreak? We’re not ready,” is foreboding. Avoidance—not wanting to face our worst fears—is one reason why the world was inadequately positioned to respond to this pandemic and its economic impact. Fear and avoidance of conflict are not solutions.
Around the world and across our countries, cities, and communities, experienced and insightful advisors are needed in this time of crisis to provide leadership and guidance. Public company leaders, including board members, are confronted by a microscopic threat that has caused thousands of deaths and paralyzed the global economy. The resulting syllogism is that since people have died from COVID-19—some with underlying conditions, but some relatively healthy—will it indiscriminately lead to many people’s deaths?
An important role of a board is to act as an advisor during crisis, helping management see down the road and around the corner. As the Global Head of Board Engagement at Nasdaq, I have the opportunity to interact with CEOs, board members, and other executive leaders. Even with the economic crisis of 2008 still visible in our rear-view mirrors, what I have seen prior to this current crisis is that too few directors were thinking about the worst-case scenario “what if.” Yet, while most were avoiding a truly worst-case scenario, I can think of two company boards where more than one director emphasized the board’s need to consider conducting “tabletop” exercises for the possibility of black swan events on an annual basis.
Financial oversight, selection of the CEO, wise counsel, and setting an enduring tone from the top are essential elements of successful corporate governance. These elements require experienced, diverse input and communication. To paraphrase Dr. Amy Acton, on the front end of a crisis, you look like an alarmist, on the back end you didn’t do enough. Another key aspect of a board is that it’s a single group comprised of individualists. In the boardroom, critical thought, constructive dissent, and credible challenge are essential. Outside of the boardroom, individuals must speak consistent with board agreement.
Leaders are made for crisis. In his 1954 Hope for the Future speech, Winston Churchill offered, “I cannot believe that the human race will not find its way through the problems that confront it, although they are separated by a measureless gulf from any they have known before… Thus, we may by patience, courage, and in orderly progression reach the shelter of a calmer and kindlier age.”1 For a visionary leader or an innovator, urgency and necessity are pathways towards inspiration and innovation. For a CEO, crisis is an opportunity to step into the gap and demonstrate courage that counts. For a board member, critical thinking may upset the status quo. I believe this, at times, is essential to drive excellence. After over ten years of measuring board performance and entering boardrooms, I have observed that constructive conflict not only builds credibility, but it is essential.
1The Estate of Winston S. Churchill (2008). Churchill By Himself: The Definitive Collection of Quotations. (Richard M. Langworth, Ed.). PublicAffairs.
© 2020 Nasdaq, Inc. The Nasdaq logo and the Nasdaq ‘ribbon’ logo are the registered and unregistered trademarks, or service marks, of Nasdaq, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. All rights reserved. This communication and the content found by following any link herein are being provided to you by Corporate Solutions, a business of Nasdaq, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, “Nasdaq”), for informational purposes only. Nothing herein shall constitute a recommendation, solicitation, invitation, inducement, promotion, or offer for the purchase or sale of any investment product, nor shall this material be construed in any way as investment, legal, or tax advice, or as a recommendation, reference, or endorsement by Nasdaq. Nasdaq makes no representation or warranty with respect to this communication or such content and expressly disclaims any implied warranty under law. At the time of publication, the information herein was believed to be accurate, however, such information is subject to change without notice. This information is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any citizen or resident of, or otherwise located in, any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to any law or regulation or which would subject Nasdaq to any registration or licensing requirements or any other liability within such jurisdiction. By reviewing this material, you acknowledge that neither Nasdaq nor any of its third-party providers shall under any circumstance be liable for any lost profits or lost opportunity, direct, indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or punitive damages whatsoever, even if Nasdaq or its third-party providers have been advised of the possibility of such damages.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.