Comerica Incorporated CMA has mentioned changes to its second-quarter 2025 outlook for loans and deposits at the Morgan Stanley US Financials, Payments & CRE Conference.
Quarter to date through May 31, 2025, the bank’s average deposits are down $0.6 billion compared with the first quarter. CMA has seen the largest declines in middle market, retail & corporate banking.
Thus, the quarter-to-date deposit trends are expected to pressure the previous second-quarter average deposit guidance. Earlier, the bank had said that it expects second-quarter 2025 average deposits to be relatively flat from the average deposits of $61.9 billion recorded in the first quarter.
The bank’s quarter-to-date average loans through May 31, 2025, are up $200 million from the previous quarter. Growth in corporate banking & private banking has been partially offset by declines in equity fund services & national dealer services.
Now, the bank expects its average loan balances to outperform the previous guidance.
Earlier, CMA had estimated its second-quarter 2025 average loans to be slightly lower than the first-quarter balance of $50.2 billion.
Comerica’s Other Key Guidance Ranges Are Unchanged
For the second quarter, net interest income (NII) is projected to be relatively flat from the $575 million recorded in the first quarter. For 2025, NII is anticipated to increase 5-7% from the 2024 reported figure.
In second-quarter 2025, non-interest income is expected to register stronger growth from the $254 million registered in the first quarter. Non-interest income in 2025 is projected to increase 2% year over year.
For the to-be-reported quarter, non-interest expenses are projected to be slightly higher than the $584 million reported in the prior quarter. For 2025, non-interest expenses are likely to rise 2-3% from those reported in 2024.
Comerica’s Price Performance & Zacks Rank
So far this year, CMA shares have lost 7% compared with the industry’s 2.7% decline.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Currently, Comerica carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Second-Quarter 2025 Outlook for CMA’s Competitors
Bank of America BAC expects investment banking (IB) fees to decline more than 20% year over year in the second quarter as tariff-related headwinds continue to hamper deal-making sentiments. In the first quarter, IB fees of $1.52 billion declined 3% as the plunge in equity underwriting income was more than offset by higher advisory revenues and debt underwriting income.
Meanwhile, driven by heightened market volatility and a rise in client activity, Bank of America projects trading revenues to grow in the mid-to-high single-digit range in the quarter.
Like Bank of America, JPMorgan JPM anticipates markets revenues to grow in the mid-to-high single-digits range on a year-over-year basis in the second quarter. This is likely to be driven by a significant rise in market volatility and higher client activity. Additionally, JPMorgan’s IB fees are expected to be down in the mid-teens range.
Research Chief Names "Single Best Pick to Double"
From thousands of stocks, 5 Zacks experts each have chosen their favorite to skyrocket +100% or more in months to come. From those 5, Director of Research Sheraz Mian hand-picks one to have the most explosive upside of all.
This company targets millennial and Gen Z audiences, generating nearly $1 billion in revenue last quarter alone. A recent pullback makes now an ideal time to jump aboard. Of course, all our elite picks aren’t winners but this one could far surpass earlier Zacks’ Stocks Set to Double like Nano-X Imaging which shot up +129.6% in little more than 9 months.
Free: See Our Top Stock And 4 Runners UpBank of America Corporation (BAC) : Free Stock Analysis Report
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Comerica Incorporated (CMA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.