MasterCard Inc. 's recent investor day spanned nearly five hours of presentations, question and answer sessions, and analyst meetings with management. In no uncertain terms, much of it was the same information repeated over and over again.
Culled from those hours full of content, here are the five most important takeaways for MasterCard investors:
1. On consumer adaptation and Apple Pay
Make no mistake, Apple Pay was a massive part of this year's investor day. It's not surprising: Apple Pay could have huge implications for payment processors when it comes to driving small-sized transaction volume.
Ed McLaughlin, the company's chief emerging payments officer, pointed out that consumer habits are quick to change: "What we have seen in markets around the world is once the consumer taps more than two or three times using their card, they never go back to the prior behavior."
Later, executives noted that in Australia, roughly half of transactions under $100 were contactless. The shift that happens evolves quickly, and it only takes a few uses for consumers to become comfortable with new technology. Thus, Apple Pay's adoption could be significant for MasterCard Inc., with the results showing up immediately.
2. Debit cards are a waste of time
Regulations surrounding the fees processors could charge for debit transactions forever changed the game in the United States. The margins on pin-based debit transactions are tiny, as Chris McWilton, president of MasterCard North America, pointed out:
It's worth noting, though, that signature debit transactions are still lucrative, as they're completed over the MasterCard network. To recap, the Federal Reserve website has an interesting breakout of average fees by transaction type.
In my mind, the only value in a pin debit transaction is adding volume to the network, which inevitably makes it harder for merchants to avoid accepting MasterCard-branded cards. But in terms of direct dollars and cents, debit provides no immediate value to MasterCard.
3. Tokens, tokens, and more tokens
No, you're not at an arcade. You're following the payments industry. And payments today are all about tokenization -- the process by which account numbers and other sensitive information is replaced with a "token" to prevent data theft and fraud.
When asked if the ability to use tokenization is a revenue opportunity, executives noted that revenue isn't the goal. McWilton defined its limited economic impact to the company:"[I] don't necessarily see it as a tremendous revenue producer or for the company; I don't think Martina or anybody at the top levels having significant revenue growth on the tokenization platform."
Rather, MasterCard believes that tokenization abilities should allow it to more quickly take over cash transactions, as it results in a safer transaction for businesses and customers. Most notably, tokenization plays an important role in convincing customers to use mobile-based payment options.
4. On beating its rivals in global transactions
Payments rival Visa has experienced hard times in cross-border transactions. This much was clear from Visa's latest conference call . But MasterCard has done well in the space, and analysts want to know why the divergence exists.
Gary Flood, president of Global Payments and Solutions, attributed it to MasterCard's focus on cross-border transactions:
Cross-border transactions aren't just another line-item. They're more profitable for the payment processors, since each transaction results in two fees: a processing fee, and a foreign currency translation fee.
5. The economics of Apple Pay are uncertain, particularly over the long term
No payments industry executive has yet to let the underlying economics of Apple Pay out of the bag. However, one question at MasterCard's investor day puts the product and its impact into terms in a way that investors should ponder for months -- and years -- to come.
A William Blair analyst asked pointedly:"[T]here has been discussion about Apple getting 15 to 25 basis points of the interchange and I just wondered what your thoughts were on how that might affect pricing in the industry and who is going to lose that share of the payment pie."
This may have been the most important question of the day, as it centers purely on MasterCard's ongoing pricing power in a payments industry that is rapidly changing.
Don't hyperfocus on Apple Pay. This isn't just about Apple Pay alone -- it's about MasterCard's pricing power in a new environment where mobile platforms can skim a few pennies off every transaction.
While you shouldn't underestimate MasterCard's ability to get billions of its cards in consumer's hands, you shouldn't underestimate technology players' interests in getting their slice of the payments pie, either.
MasterCard + Apple? This device makes it possible.
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out , and some early viewers are claiming its destined to change everything from banking to health care. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here !
The article 5 Things MasterCard Inc. Management Wants You to Know originally appeared on Fool.com.
Jordan Wathen has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends MasterCard and Visa. The Motley Fool owns shares of MasterCard and Visa. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
