Shares of solar installer Sunrun Inc. (NASDAQ: RUN) jumped as much as 14% in trading Monday after analysts at Credit Suisse initiated very bullish coverage on the stock. Shares traded higher throughout the day and were up 11.9% at 2:10 p.m. EST.
Credit Suisse initiated its coverage on Sunrun's stock with a buy rating and $15 price target on the stock. That's almost triple Friday's closing price, and would be a massive jump in value over the next year, the time frame usually covered by price targets.
The analyst pointed to Sunrun likely surpassing Tesla as the No. 1 U.S. solar installer in the fourth quarter, and the company's multichannel approach, as its biggest strengths. The company also has access to ample financing to fund its solar leasing business, which is where it creates value.
The bullish call comes at an odd time for the U.S. solar industry. Solar tariffs will make it more costly to install solar in the U.S. and could squeeze Sunrun's margins over the next few years. Then there's rising interest rates, which will make financing more costly. Finally, Sunrun has doubled down on leasing solar systems to customers as the market share of leases has gone down. I'm not sure how long the company can fight that trend.
Sunrun has done a good job gaining market share. But it's facing some headwinds that will put pressure on a business that's already fighting against market trends, so I'm much more cautious on the stock long-term.
10 stocks we like better than Sunrun
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor , has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Sunrun wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of February 5, 2018
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.