Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.
What: Shares of Outerwall are enjoying a 10% gain as of this writing around 1 p.m. Friday, after a wild morning that saw gains ranging from a modest 4% all the way up to 12%. The market seems to have settled on the high end of that range now that it's had a chance to fully digest Outerwall's strong first-quarter earnings report, which was released yesterday evening.
So what: Outerwall's quarterly revenue came in at $608.6 million, up 2% year-over-year, and adjusted earnings from continuing operations ("core" earnings) doubled year-over-year to reach $2.87 per share. On a GAAP basis, Outerwall earned $1.87 per share, which was also approximately double what the company earned in the year-ago quarter. The company's top line bested Wall Street's projections for $596.6 million in quarterly revenue, and its EPS results destroyed the consensus on both a GAAP and an adjusted basis -- especially on an adjusted basis, which beat expectations by more than a dollar per share.
Outerwall's full-year guidance was updated to call for 2015 revenue in a range of $2.294 billion to $2.419 billion, with core EPS ranging from $7.49 to $8.49. While the company's top-line guidance merely hits Wall Street's full-year consensus at its midpoint, its EPS range easily bests the $7.14 in full-year earnings analysts had expected.
Now what : Today's pop simply returns Outerwall to positive territory for the past year of trading, and it's easy to understand why investors might be skittish when considering the company's recent financial results. This year's revenue is projected to grow a mere 2% from 2014's results, and those results were effectively even with 2013's revenue.
However, Outerwall has performed well on the bottom line in recent years, and looks set to do so again. This year's adjusted EPS guidance anticipates a 24% improvement over 2014's result, which was itself a 9% improvement over 2013. At the midpoint of its full-year guidance, Outerwall's P/E is a mere 9.2, and at the midpoint of its full-year free cash flow projections (in a range of $215 million to $255 million), Outerwall's forward price-to-free-cash-flow ratio is a rock-bottom 5.9. This is a fantastically profitable company that many people believe will be left behind by a shift to digital video. If Outerwall can overcome that perception with a new line of business that can eventually replace its Redbox kiosks, today's price will look downright dirt cheap. The question is: Can Outerwall find its next big thing in time?
3 Companies Poised to Explode When Cable Dies
Cable is dying. And there are 3 stocks that are poised to explode when this faltering $2.2 trillion industry finally bites the dust. Just like newspaper publishers, telephone utilities, stockbrokers, record companies, bookstores, travel agencies, and big box retailers did when the Internet swept away their business models. And when cable falters, you don't want to miss out on these three companies are positioned to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They'renot Netflix, Google, and Apple.
The article Why Shares of Outerwall Inc Zigzagged Up Today originally appeared on Fool.com.
Alex Planes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Google (A shares), Google (C shares), and Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A shares), Google (C shares), and Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Copyright © 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
