Personal Finance

Why Investors Shouldn't Panic About Apple's Smartwatch Share Loss

A person skiing while wearing an Apple Watch.

One product line that has proven to be a runaway success for Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is the Apple Watch. Many competitors had launched multiple smartwatch generations before Apple debuted its first, but it still managed to grow the total addressable market (TAM) and, along the way, become the dominant smartwatch maker by unit shipments and revenue.

According to a press release from Strategy Analytics, Apple shipped 22.5 million smartwatches in 2018, up 27.1% from the year prior. However, Strategy Analytics' data also shows that Apple's share of the overall smartwatch market dropped to 50% in 2018 from 60% in 2017.

A person skiing while wearing an Apple Watch.

This Apple Watch wearer is going downhill, but Apple's smartwatch business isn't in a slide. Image source: Apple.

Should investors worry that Apple is losing its grip on this market? Here's why I don't think so.

A significant distortion

According to Strategy Analytics, Apple's share loss came as Fitbit (NYSE: FIT) expanded its share from 1.7% in 2017 to 12.2% in 2018. Samsung (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF) saw its smartwatch share rise to 11.8% from 10.6% in the prior year. Strategy Analytics' data shows that all other smartwatch makers, in aggregate, saw their unit shares drop somewhat.

Now, based on these numbers alone, you might ask, "Is Fitbit crushing Apple in the smartwatch market?"

The answer to that is, "No, not really."

For its fiscal year 2018 -- which ended on Dec. 31, 2018 -- Fitbi t report ed revenue of $1.51 billion, which was down significantly from $1.62 billion in the prior year. The company lost money ($185.8 million, to be precise) and saw an overall reduction in unit shipments from 15.3 million to 13.9 million.

What's happening here is simple: Sales of the company's fitness trackers -- devices that are less functional and cheaper than typical smartwatches -- have been on the decline, and that shipment decline has been partly offset by sales of the company's own smartwatch products . Indeed, the company said that in 2018, 44% of its revenue came from smartwatches, up from just 8% in the prior year.

So, since Fitbit is essentially replacing lost sales of fitness trackers (which don't count as smartwatches for Strategy Analytics' purposes) with its smartwatches, Fitbit has seen its share of the smartwatch market soar. The company's share of the wearables market, on the other hand, is likely down, considering that its total device shipments were down year over year.

Is Fitbit even competing with Apple?

If you go to Fitbit's website, you'll see that the company's cheapest Fitbit, the Versa, sells for $199.95; the more expensive Ionic sells for $269.95.

Apple's cheapest Apple Watch, a GPS-only Apple Watch Series 3, starts at $279.99. Apple offers newer Apple Watch variants with features like premium stainless steel casings and cellular connectivity for up to $849.

Apple also sells bands for its watches for as much as $149, something that undoubtedly helps boost the company's overall watch-related revenue.

The reality is that it doesn't look like Fitbit is actually denting Apple's watch business. Indeed, as Strategy Analytics' data shows, the Apple Watch continues to enjoy strong growth in unit shipments even in an increasingly competitive market. And, frankly, the large decline in Apple's smartwatch share seems more a function of the significant increase in the TAM as a result of Fitbit shifting its product mix from fitness trackers to smartwatches, rather than some fundamental disruption of Apple's business.

It's also telling that while Fitbit's total revenue in 2018 was just $1.51 billion, Apple CFO Luca Maestri said on the company's most recent earnings call that Apple's wearables business is "approaching the size of a Fortune 200 company." (Put another way, that means it's getting close to generating $14.6 billion in annual revenue.)

Not all of that revenue comes from the Apple Watch (wearables also include the company's AirPods line of wireless earbuds as well as its Beats family of headphones), but I'd be willing to bet that Apple's smartwatch revenue share relative to Fitbit is far greater than its unit share.

So, relax, Apple shareholders: Apple's smartwatch business is still doing phenomenally, and the apparently large drop in unit share isn't actually cause for alarm or, frankly, even concern.

10 stocks we like better than Apple

When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor , has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Apple wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of February 1, 2019

Ashraf Eassa has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Apple and Fitbit. The Motley Fool has the following options: long January 2020 $150 calls on Apple and short January 2020 $155 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story

AAPL FIT

Other Topics

Stocks

The Motley Fool

Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

Learn More