Shares of laser-maker II-VI Inc. (NASDAQ: IIVI) surged 8.2% on Friday after the stock received a positive mention in a Morgan Stanley note describing investment opportunities "in the optical space." This capped a week that saw II-VI add 9.6% to its market capitalization.
Citing "strong" secular tailwinds from such technologies as facial recognition, optical networking, and industrial lasers, Morgan Stanley named II-VI -- pronounced "two-six" -- its top pick in this subindustry. The analyst initiated coverage of II-VI with an overweight rating and a $46 price target, reports TheFly.com .
II-VI boasts a diversified customer base and differentiated processes that should enable it to generate more consistent earnings growth than its laser-making peers. In that regard, S&P Global Market Intelligence shows analysts, on average, predicting that II-VI will grow its sales at roughly 13.6% annually over the next five years.
Here's the really good part: Morgan Stanley, in particular, argues that "volume and yield improvement" should enable II-VI to grow its profit 50% to 100% faster than that 13.6% sales-growth rate -- implying a profit growth rate of as much as 27% annualized.
That's not just better than II-VI's peers are expected to do -- it's potential earnings growth that's nearly twice as fast as the 15% rate that the rest of Wall Street predicts II-VI will achieve. No wonder investors took such a shine to this laser maker on Friday.
10 stocks we like better than II-VI
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor , has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and II-VI wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 5, 2018
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.