Why DSW Could Be a Top Value Stock Pick
Value investing is always a very popular strategy, and for good reason. After all, who doesn't want to find stocks that have low PEs, solid outlooks, and decent dividends?
Fortunately for investors looking for this combination, we have identified a strong candidate which may be an impressive value; DSW Inc.DSW .
DSW in Focus
DSW may be an interesting play thanks to its forward PE of 18.6 its P/S ratio of 0.9, and its decent dividend yield of 3.1%. These factors suggest that DSW is a pretty good value pick, as investors have to pay a relatively low level for each dollar of earnings, and that DSW has decent revenue metrics to back up its earnings.
DSW Inc. PE Ratio (TTM)
But before you think that DSW is just a pure value play, it is important to note that it has been seeing solid activity on the earnings estimate front as well. For current year earnings, the consensus has gone up by 8.1% in the past 30 days, thanks to five upward revisions in the past one months compared to none lower.
This estimate strength is actually enough to push DSW to a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), suggesting it is poised to outperform. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here .
So really, DSW is looking great from a number of angles thanks to its PE below 20, a P/S ratio below one, and a strong Zacks Rank, meaning that this company could be a great choice for value investors at this time.
Will You Make a Fortune on the Shift to Electric Cars?
Here's another stock idea to consider. Much like petroleum 150 years ago, lithium power may soon shake the world, creating millionaires and reshaping geo-politics. Soon electric vehicles (EVs) may be cheaper than gas guzzlers. Some are already reaching 265 miles on a single charge.
With battery prices plummeting and charging stations set to multiply, one company stands out as the #1 stock to buy according to Zacks research.
It's not the one you think.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.