Personal Finance

Why Disney Is Breaking Up With Netflix

Sven the reindeer, pulling a sleigh, looks back at Olaf the snowman hanging on the back of the sleigh. in an ad for the upcoming Disney short "Olaf's Frozen Adventure."

The big entertainment business news of this week was Walt Disney 's (NYSE: DIS) divorce from Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) . To recap, the House of Mouse said it will begin removing most of its content from Netflix beginning in 2019, migrating it to a newly created streaming service of its own. Separate to the Netflix untethering, it'll also set up a dedicated ESPN streaming service for its sports content.

Disney investors weren't cheered by this move; that, plus several uninspiring fundamentals in the company's Q3 earnings report, drove the share price down notably . But Disney has good reasons for its decision, and I think there's a good chance this will work out to its advantage.

Disney goes in-house

In the conference call covering the quarterly results, Disney CEO Bob Iger naturally waxed optimistic about the migration away from Netflix and the planned ESPN service.

According to him, they mark "the beginning of what will be an entirely new growth strategy for the company, one that takes advantage of the opportunities the changing media and technology industries provide us to leverage the strength of our great brands."

Disney clearly believes it can better line its pockets by moving streaming capabilities in-house. That stands to reason, as it has a considerable library of films and TV hooked to top classic and contemporary brands (Mickey Mouse and Frozen , to cite just a few examples) that it can pack into the main streaming service. And that doesn't even include the lucrative Marvel superhero films and the Star Wars movies, which may or may not be part of this offering.

Sven the reindeer, pulling a sleigh, looks back at Olaf the snowman hanging on the back of the sleigh. in an ad for the upcoming Disney short "Olaf's Frozen Adventure."

Image source: Walt Disney.

The company is certainly putting its money where its mouth is. It also announced that it'll pay just under $1.6 billion to purchase an additional 42% of BAMTech, the video streaming company that will develop the two services. Added to the stake Disney already holds, this will give it a strong majority of 75% of the company.

"This move gives us immediate access to the team and the technology we need to deliver the highest quality direct-to-consumer experience, which ultimately gives us much greater control of our own destiny in a rapidly changing market," Iger said of the investment.

Even for a company as wealthy as Disney, $1.6 billion isn't chump change, and the BAMTech purchase sure isn't an impulse buy. It's a serious and concentrated attempt to push into the future of entertainment distribution. As such, Disney has a strong incentive to make it work.

A man and a women refusing to sign a document.

Image source: Getty Images.

Content is king for the content king

If any media company knows how to spin intellectual property into gold, it's Disney. Although the Q3 results weren't particularly inspiring, on a longer-term basis the company has managed to build most of its business units -- I'm thinking specifically of media networks (i.e., television), studio (films), consumer products, and particularly parks and resorts -- into behemoths in their respective segments.

Revenue and profitability for all have increased nicely over the years, despite the well-publicized damage from ESPN's subscriber losses.

So I'd bet on seeing Disney find a way to bring in more revenue from Disney Streaming (or whatever it'll be named) than the company currently draws from having Netflix license its content. The ESPN service might be another matter; content acquisition costs are ruinously high, the company is locked into its most important sports licensing deals, and the audience just doesn't seem as interested as it once was.

We need more clarification on what will be available through Disney Streaming to make a better judgment on its viability, because the presence, or lack thereof, of Marvel films and Star Wars , will make a big difference. But as I noted, even without them there will be plenty of material for fans of the company's many properties.

Disney is on top of the market when it comes to content; it's also proved over the years that it knows how to make a buck or several from it. I think it has a better chance to benefit from the Netflix divorce than suffer from it.

10 stocks we like better than Walt Disney

When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor , has tripled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Walt Disney wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

Click here to learn about these picks!

*Stock Advisor returns as of August 1, 2017

Eric Volkman owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Netflix and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story


Other Topics


Latest Personal Finance Videos

The Motley Fool

Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

Learn More