Why Apple's In-Screen Fingerprint Reader Could Do More Harm Than Good

Convenience can sometimes come at a big cost. While consumers, especially Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) fans, love to flock to the latest and greatest technologies, there are times when maybe that might not be the best approach. A good example is the in-screen fingerprint reader that Apple has been working on. Fingerprint scanning itself isn't new, as iPhones first featured it way back in 2013. And neither are in-screen fingerprint readers, as many Android devices feature them already. However, they aren't terribly good

The problem is that, as companies shift more toward biometric data, especially Apple, which is a leader in the industry, it could spell bad news for both consumers and businesses.

Why it's bad for consumers

As companies gravitate away from pin codes and more toward face IDs and fingerprint readers to unlock their devices, users give more and more of their information away to be stored on a phone. It's dangerous because now these tech companies have even more information than ever before -- sensitive information that if compromised or mismanaged could put users' privacy at risk.

An empty Apple Store as seen from outside.


Unlike simply resetting or changing a password, users do not have the same recourse if their biometrical information is compromised. The potential for identity theft could be heightened as a result of these types of breaches, and in 2018, losses totaled $1.48 billion due to identity theft.  

Even if there hasn't been a breach, requests for data from law enforcement could also make that information available to the police. And although Apple may be committed to protecting user privacy, that doesn't mean that all companies are of the same mindset.

Why it's bad for businesses

From a business standpoint, biometrical data also creates a bigger liability issue. While Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) may be facing issues related to protecting data, there's more safeguarding that would need to be in place to protect biometrics given the vulnerability of such information. Forbes recently reported on a case where there has already been a breach that has impacted millions of users and that included biometrical data being compromised. (This breach included both fingerprint and facial recognition.) While the long-term consequences of that are unknown, the problem for users is obvious: Biometric data can't be changed and will remain linked to them forever, barring some significant changes to their physical appearance.

As biometrics play a larger role in the tech industry, there will also be more ways for it to impact users' day-to-day lives, especially if we see apps start to go down this route, too, and if passwords become obsolete. That's only going to make that information much more vital to protect.

Legal experts note that many states do not have regulations protecting biometric data, but that's starting to change, and that means companies should be proactive in ensuring that their policies and procedures are airtight to ensure data is well protected. 

Why does this matter to investors?

By focusing on novelty features like fingerprint scanning, Apple is exposing itself to more liability. With nearly $60 billion in profits for fiscal 2018, the company certainly has ample room to handle the added costs and controls. However, cost isn't the only consideration, as from an investor's standpoint, it's questionable how much value this adds to a product compared to the potential costs and liabilities that could come from it.

For now, consumers may not think twice about giving Apple their biometrical data, but as more breaches happen and as we start to see the consequences realized from them, it could scare people away from devices that use biometric data. While that day might not come anytime soon, if it does, it could be damaging for a company that's already had trouble with iPhone sales.

10 stocks we like better than Apple
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Apple wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks


*Stock Advisor returns as of June 1, 2019


Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Apple and Facebook. The Motley Fool has the following options: short January 2020 $155 calls on Apple, long January 2020 $150 calls on Apple, short January 2020 $155 calls on Apple, and long January 2020 $150 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story


Latest Markets Videos

    The Motley Fool

    Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

    Learn More