What Inferences Can We Make About 2017 On The Basis Of 91 Years Of Market History?

An image of a man at his desk working using two monitors
Credit: Shutterstock photo

By Ronald Surz :

The Future: 2017

Here are a few predictions for 2017 that I'd be happy to discuss with you:

  • There will be a major breakthrough in target date funds that will revolutionize the entire defined contribution pension industry. Expect an announcement in March, or sooner.
  • Despite consensus forecasts to the contrary, stock and bond markets will lose value. This is a rare event. Going back to 1926, stocks and bonds have only had simultaneous calendar-year losses three times - 1931, 1941 and 1969.
  • Because 2017 will disappoint, protective strategies will gain assets as investors "close the barn door." Hedge funds and portfolio insurance will benefit.
  • Recent reversals will continue into 2017. Specifically, commodities and energy will fare well while health care will struggle. On the country front, Canada and Emerging Markets will do well.
  • Smaller value stocks will underperform as investors realize that the lemming stampede to "smart beta" has created a greater-fool valuation bubble. Smart beta will not "work." Ask me about a smarter beta that will work.

Many of these predictions are inferred from the following. You'll develop more inferences of your own.

The Recent Past

(click to enlarge)

With the exceptions of a couple of slight stumbles in 2011 and 2015, the 2008 market correction has been followed by consistent market gains, with 2016 delivering a 13% total market return. It's been an eight-peat: eight straight years of solid market gains. The U.S. stock market has returned a compound 12.5% per year over the past 8 years, well exceeding the market's 10% per year average. On a cumulative basis, the US stock market has grown more than 150%.

But folding in 2008's 38% loss leaves us with a 60% 9-year cumulative return, or 5% per year, well below the market's 10% average.

Some look at the past 8 years and say we're due for a correction while others look at the past 9 years and say we still have more ground to make up. In both cases, the time frame is too short to make a meaningful guess, so we've examined 90 years of US stock market history, looking for patterns in 5-year returns.

(click to enlarge)

Here are a couple observations:

  • There appears to be a pattern in stock prices that oscillates on a 20-year schedule - above average for 20 years, then below average, etc. If this pattern is currently repeating, we are in a 20-year down period that has been interrupted in the past 5 years.
  • We could be repeating the "Fools Rally" of 1932-1936, when the market temporarily rebounded from the Great Depression, only to be slapped down hard again in the subsequent 5 years.

What do your eyes tell you?

In the next sections, we look at diversifying asset class performance in 2016 and the past 10 years, and then examine US and foreign stock markets' performance in detail.

America the Beautiful

The US stock market performed best in 2016, as shown in the graph below. As is usually the case, there is a wide dispersion of performance in 2016 among multi-asset portfolios caused by offsetting diversification effects. For example, the graph on the right shows 2016 performances for the SMART Target Date Fund Indexes .

(click to enlarge)

Diversification into commodities, gold and real estate helped performance, but diversification into foreign stocks and bonds hurt, due in part to the 3.6% strengthening of the US dollar.

All the bars in the exhibit are green, indicating that all asset classes earned positive returns in 2016. This fact will increase correlation approximations, reducing the estimated benefits of diversification going forward.

Looking back over the past 10 years, we see that the U.S. stock market maintains its leadership, despite its 38% loss in 2008. It's literally been "better than gold." By contrast, commodities have been slammed. Relative to this longer-term perspective, the 2016 picture shows momentum in U.S. stocks and a reversal in commodities.

(click to enlarge)

In the following, we examine the performance of US and foreign markets in 2016 and the past ten years.

U.S. stocks

Small-cap stocks led the way in 2016, with small-cap value stocks performing best, earning 27%. By contrast, large-cap growth companies earned only 2%. I use Surz Style Pure classifications throughout this commentary.

(click to enlarge)

Winners and Losers in 2016 and the 10 Years Ending 2016

Much of the recent success in smaller company value stocks can be attributed to the popularity of "smart beta" that tilts toward smaller companies and value. Smart beta strategies have attracted more than $500 billion, which is about 20% of all US exchange-traded product.

Note that the S&P 500 returned 12% (not shown), which is less than the total market's 13% return because smaller companies were in favor.

On the sector front, energy stocks fared best, earning 27%, marking a significant reversal (see discussion below on 10-year results). By contrast, healthcare stocks lost 5%, also a reversal.

(click to enlarge)

Looking back over the past 10 years, we see that mid-cap value stocks have performed best with a 9% per year return, while small-cap growth stocks have lagged with a 3% return. Opposing other style index providers, value stocks by our definition have outperformed growth stocks. Surz Style Pure indexes disagree with other style providers for this decade .

Turning attention to sector performance for the decade, returns in the following chart are shown in the same sequence as the year, so you can see that the big changes in 2016 are reversals in energy and health care. Energy stocks had been underperforming prior to 2016 while health care had been outperforming.

(click to enlarge)

Foreign stocks

Looking outside the U.S., foreign markets earned 6.5% in 2016, lagging the U.S. stock market's 13% return, but exceeding EAFE's 1.5% return. Japan and Europe were laggards in 2016, earning 6% and 1.5%, respectively, and these countries are the major components of EAFE.

(click to enlarge)

On the style front, value stocks performed best with a 16% return while growth stocks lost 2.5%.

Looking back over the past 10 years, foreign market returns of 5% per year have lagged the U.S. and EAFE, both with 7% returns. Like the U.S., there was a reversal in 2016 - Canada had been underperforming.

On the style front, value stocks returned 9% while growth stocks earned only 2.5%. Value stocks have been in favor around the world.

(click to enlarge)

The Distant Past: 1926-2016

The 91-year history of the U.S. capital markets

The table below shows the history of risk and return for stocks (S&P 500), bonds (Barclays Aggregate), T-bills and inflation. There are many lessons in this table, so it's worth your time and effort to review these results. For example, here are a few of the lessons:

  1. T-bill returns have just barely exceeded inflation over the full 91-year history, earning 3.43% per year versus inflation of 2.94%, a difference of 49 basis points per year. The past decade has inflation exceeding T-bills by more than 1% per year. T-bills earned .73% versus inflation at 1.75%. In real terms (net of inflation), we've been paying the government to use its mattress.
  2. Bonds were more "efficient," delivering more returns per unit of risk than stocks in the first 45 years, but they have been about as efficient in the most recent 46 years. The Sharpe ratio for bonds is .48 versus .34 for stocks in the first 45 years, but the Sharpe ratio for bonds in the recent 46 years is .32, which is somewhat less than stocks at .35.
  3. The past decade (2007-2016) matches the decade 1967-1976 in return and risk, with returns near 7% and risk near 15%. The only decade worse than these two was 1937-1946, with a return of 4.41% and whopping risk of 22.6%. It's been a relatively poor decade.
  4. Despite recently low levels of inflation, average inflation in the past 46 years has been more than twice that of the previous 45 years: 1.83% in 1926-1970 versus 4.03% in 1971-2016.
  5. Bonds returned 2.3% above inflation in the first 44 years, and that almost doubled to 4% in the past 45 years.
  6. The 10.27% standard deviation of monthly stock returns in 2016 is about half the historical average of 18.78%. It was a "quiet" year.

(click to enlarge)

Additional perspective is provided by the following histograms of stock and bond returns.

(click to enlarge)

(click to enlarge)

Ron Surz is President and CEO of PPCA Inc. and its Target Date Solutions subsidiary. Both are in San Clemente, CA. Ron is a performance evaluation veteran who started with A.G. Becker in the 1970s. PPCA provides contemporary investment manager due diligence software and Surz Style Pure Indexes including Centric Core . Target Date Solutions manages target date funds using its patented Safe Landing Glide Path , and has published a book to help fiduciaries select TDFs.

He is also a partner of Paladin Financial Technology , Sortino Investment Analytics , and TDF Builder .

See also 2017 Starts On A Positive Note - Much Better Than 2016! on

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story


Other Topics


Latest Markets Videos


    Seeking Alpha is the world’s largest investing community. Seeking Alpha has unparalleled breadth and depth: from stocks, ETFs and mutual funds to commodities and cryptocurrency, including thousands of stocks (such as small-caps) not analyzed elsewhere. Written by investors for investors, more than 7,000 contributors publish 10,000 investing ideas every month.

    Learn More