ETFs

The Electric Vehicle Revolution Charges Ahead

By David Semple, Portfolio Manager, Emerging Markets Equity Strategy; Shawn Reynolds, Portfolio Manager; Veronica Zhang, Analyst; Angus Shillington, Deputy Portfolio Manager; Dominic Jacobson, Analyst; Oksana Miller, Product Manager

The transition from conventional cars to electric vehicles (EVs) is accelerating, directly impacting auto makers and auto parts providers. This is creating investment opportunities in battery cell makers, charging infrastructure and charge stations, optimization software, as well as semiconductors, cameras, etc. We strongly believe this acceleration will continue, as stickier price parity between EV and fossil fuel autos is upon us and Wright’s Law[1] continues to drive down EV costs – especially in the battery and battery software space. In our view, EV investing is a forward-looking, innovative and disruptive theme.

In this blog, we will explore:

  • Growing EV demand, which is driving an accelerated conventional cars-to-EV transition and its hyper adoption globally.
  • Two major inflections on the supply side—an EV-dedicated platform and technological innovation—that are driving EV penetration and adoption levels.
  • Opportunities within the EV investment universe.

A Road to Platform Ecosystem – Key Investment Themes

A Road to Platform Ecosystem - Key Investment Themes

Source: Macquarie Research. Data as of September 8, 2020.

Cracking the investment code across the vast and diffuse EV investment universe includes understanding complex global supply chains, competing standards, prevailing regulatory structures and national policy and subsidy decision making. The answer to “Do you invest in EV?” is staggering in its complexity and scope.

Based on years of research conducted across the Investment Teams for the VanEck Emerging Markets Equity Strategy (EME) and the VanEck Global Hard Assets Strategy (GHA), greater sustainability, cost optimization and more visible and persistent returns appear to reside in very specific parts of the value chain. These include static battery cells (EME holdings: Samsung SDI[2] and LG Chem Ltd.[3]; GHA holding: Freyr[4]), storage software (GHA holding: Stem[5]), as well as infrastructure such as semiconductors and EV charge stations (EME holding: Qingdao TGOOD Electric Co. Ltd.[6] and GHA holding: EVgo[7]).

Global EV Penetration: Unprecedented Levels, Groundbreaking Speeds

From a consumer preference, competitive unit pricing and regulatory perspective, conventional automobiles are becoming increasingly unwelcome across the world. This accelerating trend lifts demand, which helps add production scale, increasingly helping to drive down the cost of EV ownership to a level where the economic choice tilts in favor of EVs. In the past, the demand momentum was largely driven by the environmental concerns of the buyer, subsidies, as well as increasing performance and innovation.

Growing demand and supply innovations are driving an accelerated conventional cars-to-EV transition globally. In 2021, for the first time in history, we expect strong growth in EV sales in both China and EU, the two largest EV markets.

Global EV Penetration Forecast

Global EV Penetration Forecast

Source: Morgan Stanley Research. Data as of February 2021.

EV Growth around the World

EV Growth around the World

Source: EAAM, CAAM, EVinside, Macquarie Research. Data as of December 15, 2020.

Global government policy support for EV is growing. We have seen this through outright future regulatory elimination of conventional cars, coupled with supportive policies around EV subsidies and infrastructure. Given the boost from these initiatives, EV sales growth in China, for example, is likely to be in the region of 1.7M units next year (+31% YoY) and in the EU 1.9M units (+58% YoY).[8]

Here is an overview of the latest policy developments relating to EVs globally:

Latest Policy Developments Relating to EVs Globally

Source: Macquarie Research. Data as of December 15, 2020.

Battery innovation helps address bottlenecks. Other than price, in the past, the two biggest drawbacks for consumers has tended to be EV’s limited range and slow charging. Battery innovation is a potential solution for both of these demand bottlenecks, and offers an opportunity for investors to gain exposure to growing EV adoption.

Tier one battery manufacturers are key enablers of the electric revolution, and over recent years, they have formed a global oligopoly. Their commitment to research and development (R&D) and ever increasing manufacturing efficiency continues to result in improvements in the range, cost and safety of EVs. The EME Investment Team’s discussion with management and industry experts indicates that short-term battery performance will be driven by further optimization of cathode chemistry, silicon-carbon blended anodes and cell-to-pack (CTP) efficiency. While longer-term innovation will be found in solid state batteries and other next generation technologies, we are optimistic that Samsung SDI and LG Chem (EME holdings) will spearhead battery innovation over the next decade.

We strongly believe that EVs will be competitive when the time to charge them is as quick as filling a gas tank. Technology has advanced to a stage that a battery can now be partially charged very quickly, and we are very attracted to mass charging infrastructure. Helping to promote adoption, government policy is increasingly supporting funding alongside private investments toward buildout of the charging infrastructure. Capitalizing on the need by auto original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to address the bottleneck limiting mass market adoption of their products are companies such as EVgo (GHA holding). EVgo builds and operates charging stalls and maintains nearly a 50% share in the public fast charging market in the U.S., with partnerships to support the upfront capex investment of their stations. In China and the U.S., scale and first-mover advantage are critical for companies to become regional leaders in high density areas – and payback of the infrastructure investment is also shorter and much faster.

Innovation extends beyond the cell. The value proposition for faster EV adoption extends beyond the cost of the battery itself and includes the battery manufacturing method, as well as energy management around EVs, batteries and the grid.

The number of models and types of EVs slated to come to market within the next five years currently outpaces battery manufacturing supply. Both Asian and European battery manufacturers are establishing regional supply chains closer to the European auto OEM and putting their own, unique spin on manufacturing. Freyr (GHA holding), coming public via merger with Alussa Energy, is establishing a presence in Norway to build chemistry-agnostic batteries using a production process 30% shorter than the conventional method. It will be powered by 100% renewable resources, addressing the longstanding debate of absolute emission impact around EV, from well to wheel.

While manufacturing and cell design are driving down battery cost, we are seeing an increasing focus from the industry toward behind-the-meter energy management. A standalone battery is used as energy backup, whereas a battery connected to the grid harnesses a much more efficient flow of two-way electricity usage that leverages utility rates with optimal time-of-use. Predictive analytics between the grid and battery results in a lower electricity rate, which is then translated into better economics for EV and battery owners. Stem (GHA holding), coming public via merger with Star Peak Energy, is a software platform that uses AI to optimize energy usage between commercial batteries and the grid. The software contributes to a meaningful reduction in monthly bills, and the customer data collected over time is then used toward better grid management for utilities.[9] The ecosystem results in higher adoption of batteries, given the lower cost of ownership for the entire system.

Capacity needs are growing. The need for higher battery capacity to meet the fast-growing, global EV demand is another integral component in the EV supply chain and penetration efforts.

Strong Growth: Automotive Battery Demand Estimates

Strong Growth: Automotive Battery Demand Estimates

Source: IHS Global Insight, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research. Data as of September 24, 2020.

Costs are decreasing. Lower battery costs (implicit in cell design, material, manufacturing, cell-to-vehicle production streamlining, etc.) should lead to an increase in overall capacity and further acceleration of EV adoption levels globally. Securing strategic domestic battery input materials is a high priority for governments around the world and is considered a vital aspect of driving down integrated battery manufacturing costs. As EVs and batteries proliferate, consumption of minerals such as copper, lithium, cobalt, manganese, rare earth metals and graphite are predicted to grow to exceptional levels. Existing mining firms (GHA holdings: First Quantum[10] and MP Materials[11]) as well as numerous new players (GHA holdings: Euro Manganese[12] and Piedmont Lithium[13]) are emerging to satisfy this demand, and additional geographically diverse suppliers are expected to come to market.

Battery Cost Composition and Cost Cutting

Battery Cost Composition and Cost Cutting

Source: Company Data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research. Data as of September 24, 2020.

Robust Outlook for EVs Globally

Looking forward, we expect the robust growth outlook for electric vehicles to continue globally. This is driven by growing EV demand coupled with the introduction of EV-dedicated platforms, new EV model launches, expanded production volume, continuous government policy support and new players entering the market. We expect China and Europe to drive the growth, with upside potential from the U.S.

Global EV Shipment Forecast

Global EV Shipment Forecast

Source: Morgan Stanley Research. Data as of January 4, 2021.

Originally published by VanEck, 2/23/21


DISCLOSURES

1 Pioneered by Theodore Wright in 1936, Wright’s Law aims to provide a reliable framework for forecasting cost declines as a function of cumulative production. Specifically, it states that for every cumulative doubling of units produced, costs will fall by a constant percentage.

2 Samsung SDI is 2.81% of EME Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

3 LG Chem Ltd. is 0.99% of EME Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

4 Freyr, coming public via merger with Alussa Energy, 0.52% of GHA Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

5 Stem, coming public via merger with Star Peak Energy, 5.23% of GHA Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

6 Qingdao TGOOD Electric Co. Ltd. is 0.67% of EME Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

7 EVgo, coming public via merger with Climate Change CR Restricted, 0.91% of GHA Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

8 Source: Macquarie Research. Data as of December 15, 2020.

9 Company Data.

10 First Quantum is 4.19% of GHA Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

11 MP Materials is 0.25% of GHA Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

12 Euro Manganese is 0.08% of GHA Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

13 Piedmont Lithium is 0.43% of GHA Strategy assets as of January 31, 2021.

All asset percentages are as of January 31, 2021.

The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are valid as of the date of this communication and subject to change without notice. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck.

This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities mentioned herein. Strategy holdings will vary.

Emerging Market securities are subject to greater risks than U.S. domestic investments. These additional risks may include exchange rate fluctuations and exchange controls; less publicly available information; more volatile or less liquid securities markets; and the possibility of arbitrary action by foreign governments, or political, economic or social instability.

Global Hard Assets securities: the Strategy may be subject to greater risks and market fluctuations than a strategy whose portfolio has exposure to a broader range of sectors. The Strategy may be susceptible to financial, economic, political or market events, as well as government regulation, impacting the hard assets sectors (such as the energy and metals sectors). Precious metals and natural resources securities are at times volatile and there may be sharp fluctuations in prices, even during periods of rising prices.

All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. As with any investment strategy, there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met and investors may lose money. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss in a declining market. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Read more on ETFtrends.com.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Latest ETFs Videos

    How Invesco-State Street Merger Talks Can Build an ETF Giant

    Invesco Inc. is reportedly in talks with State Street Corp.’s asset management arm about a possible merger that would make the combined entity the third-largest firm in passive fund management. Bloomberg’s Ritika Gupta reports.

    4 days ago