Should You Consider Floating-Rate Bank Loan ETFs In This Environment?

By Morningstar :

By Timothy Strauts

Back in October 2012, I wrote an article titled " Are Bank-Loan Funds Ready to Be Loved Again? " in which I discussed the potential benefits of bank-loan funds--particularly in the context of a period of rising interest rates. If you're unfamiliar with the bank-loan sector, take a peek at that article before reading on.

In my previous piece I noted that bank loans have tended to have low average default rates versus high-yield bonds, above-average yields, and very low duration (given that they pay floating rates), are negatively correlated to Treasury bonds, and have historically generated above-average returns in rising interest-rate environments. All of these features are still valid today.

While the key features of bank loans haven't changed much, the market environment today is quite different than it was just nine months ago. Since I last wrote about bank-loan funds, the yield on the 10-year United States Treasury bond has risen from 1.7% to about 2.5% today. Meanwhile, investors have been pouring money into bank-loan funds. How have these funds performed in this environment and what is the outlook for the future?

(click to enlarge)

A Perfect Storm Hits Bank-Loan Land

The largest bank-loan exchange-traded fund, PowerShares Senior Loan Portfolio( BKLN ) returned 3.8% from Oct. 10 to July 19. Meanwhile, Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF( BND ) , which offers broad exposure to the investment-grade bond market, declined by 1.8% over the same period. Interest rates have ticked up over the past nine months as the economy has continued to gradually improve and, more recently, in response to the Federal Reserve's signal that it may reduce the pace of its bond purchases. During this span, BKLN has performed exactly as expected. Rising rates have had very little effect on the price of bank loans, given that their duration tends to be very near 0. And given that the economy has continued to improve, the default rate within the sector over the past year has been just 1.4%. To put that in historical perspective, the long-term average default rate for bank loans has been about 3% with an average recovery rate of 70% (that is, lenders have recovered an average of 70 cents on the dollar in the event of default). All in all, the past 10 months were exactly the sort of scenario in which one would expect bank loans to outperform the broader bond market.

The Eye of the Storm?

Despite their recent rise, interest rates are still near historical lows. Since 1962, the 10-year Treasury bond has had a yield greater than the current yield 96% of the time. Interest rates would have to rise much further to reach the historical average 6.6% yield on the 10-year Treasury. Most market participants don't expect rates to touch that level in the next few years, but the consensus is that rates will continue rising. The Congressional Budget Office projects the 10-year Treasury yield will reach 3.0% in 2015 and 3.8% in 2016. If the CBO's projections pan out, then bank loans remain well-positioned to outperform other fixed-income sectors.

Bank-loan funds have received record inflows in 2013. Since the end of June, $33 billion has been invested in the category. The five largest monthly inflows on record occurred over the past five months. There is clearly tremendous investor interest in the sector. But is this popularity a cause for concern?

These strong positive flows into retail funds began about a year ago. It appears retail investors are filling the void in the bank-loan market left by the demise of leveraged hedge funds. According to Standard and Poor's, 26.8% of the bank-loan market was owned by hedge funds in 2007. By the first quarter of 2013, only 9.1% of bank loans were owned by hedge funds. These hedge funds have tended to employ significant amounts of leverage to juice equitylike returns out of bank loans. In normal markets this can be a very profitable strategy, but when the bank-loan market started to sour during the financial crisis, the use of leverage magnified these hedge funds' losses. Many of these hedge funds received margin calls and were ultimately forced to liquidate their portfolios at fire-sale prices. I believe that broader ownership amongst nonleveraged retail investors is a positive development for the overall health of the bank loan market. Under "new ownership" small losses will be less likely to cause panicked selling in the retail market the way it did amongst hedge funds meeting margin calls.

Bank loans are almost pure credit investments since they have virtually no interest-rate risk. The amount and size of future defaults is the biggest determinant on future returns. Over the past three years, the default rate within the bank-loan sector has remained below 2%. According to Standard and Poor's poll of buy-side investors, the expected default rate over the next year is only 1.8%. As long as the actual rate of default remains below 2%, expected returns of 4%-6% over the next year seem the most likely outcome based on current yields.


The biggest risk facing the bank-loan sector is a U.S. recession. Morningstar's director of economic analysis, Robert Johnson, recently published an article titled " U.S. Economy Looking a Little Accident Prone " in which he looked at the most recent round of U.S. economic data. His current forecast for second-quarter gross domestic product growth is 0.5%, but based on the recent weak economic data he does not rule out a negative number. Despite this tepid forecast, he doesn't see a recession as imminent.

Even if we re-enter recession territory in the near future, investors shouldn't panic. Since 1989, bank loans have generally posted positive returns during recessions. The exception was 2008, when the sector posted a 29% decline.

The bank-loan market of 2013 is very different from the one that imploded in 2008. The losses suffered by the sector in 2008 stemmed from overissuance of new loans in the wake of the leveraged buyout boom of 2006 and 2007. During that period, $667 billion in deals were completed, which is more than 4 times the $164 billion in bank-loan issuance tied to LBO deals struck during the past year and a half. Deals today are being completed at lower purchase price multiples and with a larger amount of equity than those of the 2007 vintage. In the past, to help secure lucrative underwriting deals banks regularly committed capital in the form of bridge loans. Bridge loans are a form of short-term financing that bridges the gap between the time a deal is completed and the point when more permanent funding is secured. According to JP Morgan, at the buyout boom's peak in 2007, banks had committed $330 billion in the form of such bridge loans. When the crisis hit, the banks were unable to raise long-term financing to redeem these bridge loans. Regulatory concerns led the banks to dump the bridge loans onto the market at the height of the crisis. This served in part to push bank-loan prices down nearly 40%. Today, bridge loans are a minor part of the overall bank-loan market.

We will inevitably move through a normal economic cycle in the coming years, and bank-loan defaults will rise as economic activity softens. That said, we are unlikely to see a dramatic collapse in prices in the bank-loan sector similar to that witnessed in 2008. This is because there is dramatically less leverage within the system given that LBO deals are much smaller in size today, bridge loans now play a relatively minor part in the financing market, and many leveraged hedge funds have retreated (or disappeared) from the market.

This Friday, I will provide an overview of the various bank-loan fund options available to investors. I will spell out the pros and cons amongst the field of mutual funds, ETFs , and closed-end funds that invest in bank loans.

Disclosure : Morningstar, Inc. licenses its indexes to institutions for a variety of reasons, including the creation of investment products and the benchmarking of existing products. When licensing indexes for the creation or benchmarking of investment products, Morningstar receives fees that are mainly based on fund assets under management. As of Sept. 30, 2012, AlphaPro Management, BlackRock Asset Management, First Asset, First Trust, Invesco, Merrill Lynch, Northern Trust, Nuveen, and Van Eck license one or more Morningstar indexes for this purpose. These investment products are not sponsored, issued, marketed, or sold by Morningstar. Morningstar does not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any investment product based on or benchmarked against a Morningstar index.

See also Understanding Arena's Revenue on

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story


Other Topics


Latest Markets Videos


    Seeking Alpha is the world’s largest investing community. Seeking Alpha has unparalleled breadth and depth: from stocks, ETFs and mutual funds to commodities and cryptocurrency, including thousands of stocks (such as small-caps) not analyzed elsewhere. Written by investors for investors, more than 7,000 contributors publish 10,000 investing ideas every month.

    Learn More