SeaDrill Limited's Best Moves in 2015
As more vessels come off contract, those operating results are likely to deteriorate next year. Seadrill already has nine vessels out of work according to its most recent fleet status report, and another nine with contracts set to expire before mid-2016. The impact of the 2016 contract expirations could surpass $400 million in lost revenues, depending on Seadrill's ability and willingness to agree to short-term or lower day-rate work.
The risk for Seadrill is compounded because it lacks a lever that other drillers can better utilize: reducing operating expenses by idling rigs. Seadrill carries a significantly higher debt load, debt expense and higher SG&A expense, than even larger competitors like Transocean :
Transocean has already started idling and stacking rigs, and has plans to idle and scrap even more in the next year. Seadrill's leveraged nature makes it harder for the company to be able to afford idling vessels to reduce costs. In other words, Seadrill's problem is becoming a revenue one, while Transocean and others can make operational moves to ride out the downturn.
The suspended dividend was a smart -- if late -- move, but it only buys time.
Delaying and cancelling newbuilds
Seadrill's situation is by and large of its own making, and in no small part because of the massive bet on the industry needing a lot more new, more capable vessels in coming years. Seadrill still has a lot of newbuild exposure, but has made progress on this front. In its February fleet status report, Seadrill reported 15 newbuilds on order, with nine of the 15 newbuilds scheduled to deliver in 2015 or 2016.
As of the most recent update, Seadrill has canceled one vessel, West Mira , due the shipbuilder's failure to meet its delivery schedule (which cost Seadrill a $1 billion contract with Husky). The company has also pushed back delivery of a number of vessels, including the first six-month extension on the delivery of Sevan Developer from November 2015 to April 2016.
Seadrill made even more progress in the second quarter, when it was able to defer delivery of two vessels from the end of 2015 all the way to early 2017, and reach an amended agreement with shipbuilder Dalian on eight jack-ups, pushing them all out about six months each, ranging from late this year to mid-2017.
This is far from an ideal newbuild schedule, since the company is still on the hook for almost $4 billion to pay for those newbuilds, and it's hard to see demand picking up when they start delivering in early 2016, but management has bought some time.
Final thoughts: Buying time for a recovery, but will it be enough?
Seadrill management is paying the price now for the aggressive growth strategy that started several years ago, and it's not clear whether these two big moves will be enough for the company to survive the downturn unscathed. Seadrill is already feeling the pinch, but as more vessels come off contract without new work lined up, the company will have fewer options at its disposal, and few of them will be good. At the same time, Transocean and a few others with less debt leverage will find it easier to cut costs.
These moves help, but it's questionable how much, or for how long.
The next billion-dollar iSecret
The world's biggest tech company forgot to show you something at its recent event, but a few Wall Street analysts and the Fool didn't miss a beat: There's a small company that's powering their brand-new gadgets and the coming revolution in technology. And we think its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors! To be one of them, just click here .
The article SeaDrill Limited's Best Moves in 2015 originally appeared on Fool.com.
Jason Hall owns shares of Seadrill. The Motley Fool recommends Seadrill. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Copyright © 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.