Is This the Real Reason Lorillard Is Willing to Sell blu eCigs?

Since the rumors of a merger between Reynolds-American and Lorillard had been swirling for months it wasn't a real surprise when a deal was finally announced last month, but what did raise some eyebrows was the decision to sell the latter's top-selling electronic cigarette brand blu eCig as part of the bargain.

E-cig sales are said to be a growth industry. Photo source: blu eCig.

Purchasing it in 2012 for $135 million, Lorillard quickly coaxed blu eCig into the industry-leading brand, generating sales of $230 million in 2013 for the tobacco giant, a nearly four-fold increase in year-over-year sales of electronic cigarette products for the company.

Blu captured 45.8% of the domestic retail electronic cigarette market dollar-wise in December of last year,, benefiting from a national television advertising campaign to build brand awareness, expanding into more than 136,000 retail outlets nationwide, and launching new, lower-cost rechargeable kits that all helped generate strong repeat business.

So when the merger with Reynolds was announced, some were left scratching their heads wondering why Lorillard would willingly give up such a strong brand. Sure, Reynolds had been investing a lot of time and money into its own e-cigarette, Vuse, which enjoyed early success in the test market states of Utah and Colorado, but it seemed it was giving up the bird it had in hand for two it might find in the bush.

Upon closer inspection though, selling blu to Imperial Tobacco Group for $7.1 billion -- along with regular tobacco brands Kool, Salem, and Winston -- might not have been the crazy decision it first seemed.

Cracks in the blu eCig monolith began appearing right away this year, first as part of industry maturation, and second, the onslaught of new competitors.

The first e-cigarettes to market adopted a look similar to traditional cigarettes, from the long white tube to a faux filter and even a glowing ember. Blu's name itself was derived from the bright blue LED on its tip to indicate when it was "lit."

Smoke doesn't get in your eyes when you vape. Photo source: blu eCig.

But as "vaping" caught on -- e-cigarettes don't emit smoke, but rather a vapor from the heating of a liquid -- the industry was quick to evolve to a point where there's a whole new language developing around the trend. No longer are e-cigarettes simply nicotine replacement therapy, but now encompass "vaping" and "tanks," and users take pride in blinging out their "mods" while enjoying flavored juices they drip onto coils.

They're not just e-cigs, but "personal vaping systems," or PVS, that resemble recorders, or that first musical instrument you were introduced to in grade school, only cooler. Now the PVS's are also called "vaporizers," "wands," or "vape pens" and a whole new culture has grown up around the phenomenon. Vape bars are the new cigar lounges without the stench.

Harry Potter's wands have nothing on these personal vaping systems. Photosource: Wikimedia Commons.

Yet the success Lorillard achieved with blu also ensured the other tobacco companies would enter the market as well, along with smaller upstarts. In addition to Reynolds' Vuse brand, Altria , which was late to the game, made up for lost time by purchasing the Green Smoke brand earlier this year and rolling out nationally its new Mark Ten brand of e-cigarettes this past June.

The cumulative effect of all this new competition took an immediate toll on Lorillard's blu. Its e-cigarette revenues dropped 14% in the first quarter to $49 million and plunged another 23% in the second quarter as lower volumes and the introduction of the lower-priced rechargeable kits cut sales, which are proving to be a popular option in e-cigarettes.

Stubbing out the competition is the up-and-coming e-cig industry leader. Photo source: Logic Smokes.

Now Nielsen data confirms that blu's fall from grace -- or at least market share -- is accelerating. According to just-released data, Logic Technology Development's brand of electronic cigarettes has moved into the top spot in terms of units with a 24.3% share, toppling Lorillard's blu eCig for the first time. While blu is still leading in dollars, Logic is closing in at No. 2 with a 22.9% share.

What may be more worrisome is that despite initial rosy projections that electronic cigarettes may one day surpass traditional tobacco sales, Nielsen is finding that sales are falling at convenience stores, down 17% for the period ending in June, though Wells Fargo (which forecast e-cigarette sales to hit $10 billion by 2017), contends sales may be moving out of c-stores and into vape shops and other nontraditional outlets.

Still, it suggests that blu's hold on the e-cigarette top spot dollar-wise may be tenuous at best and could be a big reason it found it easy to sign off on selling the brand. If and when the merger goes through, it gets a premium price for what could be a troubled product. Imperial Tobacco, on the other hand, which becomes the fourth-largest cigarette company with its portfolio of cigarettes acquired, electronic or otherwise, may find itself feeling blue with the outcome after all.

Leaked: This coming blockbuster will make every biotech jealous

The best biotech investors consistently reap gigantic profits by recognizing true potential earlier and more accurately than anyone else. Let me cut right to the chase. There is a product in development that will revolutionize not just how we treat a common chronic illness, but potentially the entire health industry. Analysts are already licking their chops at the sales potential. In order to outsmart Wall Street and realize multibagger returns you will need The Motley Fool's new free report on the dream-team responsible for this game-changing blockbuster. CLICK HERE NOW .

The article Is This the Real Reason Lorillard Is Willing to Sell blu eCigs? originally appeared on

Rich Duprey has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Other Topics


Latest Markets Videos

    The Motley Fool

    Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

    Learn More