On-Chain Data Suggests Ether Investors Bought September Dip

Ether‘s recent price drop has failed to deter investors from accumulating the cryptocurrency, on-chain data indicates.

• The second-largest cryptocurrency by market value was trading at $345 on Friday at 15:20 UTC. This represents a 20% decline on a month-to-date basis. Prices reached two-year highs above $480 on Sept. 1.
• While the cryptocurrency has suffered a double-digit price pullback, the number of ether held by top non-exchange addresses has increased by 8% to 27.79 million from 25.54 million, as per data provided by the blockchain intelligence firm Santiment.
• The total amount of ether held by non-exchange addresses has increased by 20% since mid-July.

• “Accumulation during the price drop shows investor confidence in the cryptocurrency’s long-term prospects is strengthening,” Nicholas Pelecanos, head of trading at NEM Ventures, an investment arm of the NEM blockchain ecosystem, told CoinDesk in a LinkedIn chat.
• Pelecanos expects the trend to continue as the decentralized finance (DeFi) boom shows no signs of slowing down.
• The total value locked in the DeFi applications rose above $9 billion earlier this month, an increase of more than 1,400% year-to-date, according to data source DeBank.
• Ethereum’s blockchain dominates the DeFi space, and big investors often self-custody ether on decentralized lending/borrowing platforms to generate additional returns rather than just hold.
• Ether has rallied by 168% so far this year, while bitcoin, which underwent its third mining reward halving in May, has gained 48%.

Also read: Five Years In, DeFi Now Defines Ethereum

Related Stories

• First Mover: Bitcoin Low Exchange Balance Looks Bullish but Chart Looks Bearish as $11K Nears
• Bitcoin Has Been Less Volatile Than Tesla Stock for Months
• EY Releases Enterprise Procurement Solution on Ethereum Blockchain
• Degens for Hire: Based.Money Is Launching Moonbase, a Place for DeFi Projects to Find Community

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.