Among the underlying components of the S&P 500 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (Symbol: CHRW), where a total of 27,548 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 2.8 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 214% of CHRW's average daily trading volume over the past month of 1.3 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $60 strike put option expiring August 18, 2017 , with 25,482 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 2.5 million underlying shares of CHRW. Below is a chart showing CHRW's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $60 strike highlighted in orange:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Symbol: GS) saw options trading volume of 32,899 contracts, representing approximately 3.3 million underlying shares or approximately 92.7% of GS's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 3.5 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $225 strike call option expiring June 30, 2017 , with 4,519 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 451,900 underlying shares of GS. Below is a chart showing GS's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $225 strike highlighted in orange:
And Expedia Inc (Symbol: EXPE) saw options trading volume of 11,811 contracts, representing approximately 1.2 million underlying shares or approximately 74.7% of EXPE's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.6 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $145 strike call option expiring January 19, 2018 , with 10,063 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.0 million underlying shares of EXPE. Below is a chart showing EXPE's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $145 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for CHRW options , GS options , or EXPE options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
