Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Fair Isaac Corp (Symbol: FICO), where a total of 1,095 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 109,500 underlying shares. That amounts to about 54% of FICO's average daily trading volume over the past month of 202,690 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $250 strike call option expiring April 18, 2019 , with 926 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 92,600 underlying shares of FICO. Below is a chart showing FICO's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $250 strike highlighted in orange:
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc (Symbol: MDGL) saw options trading volume of 971 contracts, representing approximately 97,100 underlying shares or approximately 50.7% of MDGL's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 191,705 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $145 strike call option expiring March 15, 2019 , with 260 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 26,000 underlying shares of MDGL. Below is a chart showing MDGL's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $145 strike highlighted in orange:
And Chart Industries Inc (Symbol: GTLS) options are showing a volume of 1,714 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 171,400 underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 50.3% of GTLS's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 340,595 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $85 strike put option expiring February 15, 2019 , with 526 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 52,600 underlying shares of GTLS. Below is a chart showing GTLS's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $85 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for FICO options , MDGL options , or GTLS options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
