Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Coach, Inc. (Symbol: COH), where a total of 38,034 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 3.8 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 74.5% of COH's average daily trading volume over the past month of 5.1 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $34 strike call option expiring March 18, 2016 , with 11,600 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.2 million underlying shares of COH. Below is a chart showing COH's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $34 strike highlighted in orange:
TiVo Inc (Symbol: TIVO) saw options trading volume of 6,197 contracts, representing approximately 619,700 underlying shares or approximately 74.1% of TIVO's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 836,315 shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $9 strike call option expiring March 18, 2016 , with 5,257 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 525,700 underlying shares of TIVO. Below is a chart showing TIVO's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $9 strike highlighted in orange:
And Chuy's Holdings Inc (Symbol: CHUY) saw options trading volume of 2,036 contracts, representing approximately 203,600 underlying shares or approximately 57.9% of CHUY's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 351,730 shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $35 strike call option expiring March 18, 2016 , with 673 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 67,300 underlying shares of CHUY. Below is a chart showing CHUY's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $35 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for COH options , TIVO options , or CHUY options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
