Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Cheniere Energy Inc. (Symbol: LNG), where a total of 13,550 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 1.4 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 78.1% of LNG's average daily trading volume over the past month of 1.7 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $50 strike call option expiring January 19, 2018 , with 3,525 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 352,500 underlying shares of LNG. Below is a chart showing LNG's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $50 strike highlighted in orange:
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corp (Symbol: NYMX) saw options trading volume of 626 contracts, representing approximately 62,600 underlying shares or approximately 77.8% of NYMX's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 80,415 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $3 strike put option expiring February 16, 2018 , with 500 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 50,000 underlying shares of NYMX. Below is a chart showing NYMX's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $3 strike highlighted in orange:
And Dominos Pizza Inc. (Symbol: DPZ) saw options trading volume of 7,109 contracts, representing approximately 710,900 underlying shares or approximately 69.5% of DPZ's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.0 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $210 strike call option expiring January 19, 2018 , with 2,502 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 250,200 underlying shares of DPZ. Below is a chart showing DPZ's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $210 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for LNG options , NYMX options , or DPZ options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
