Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Calavo Growers, Inc. (Symbol: CVGW), where a total of 902 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 90,200 underlying shares. That amounts to about 62.8% of CVGW's average daily trading volume over the past month of 143,680 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $95 strike call option expiring April 20, 2018 , with 288 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 28,800 underlying shares of CVGW. Below is a chart showing CVGW's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $95 strike highlighted in orange:
Cheniere Energy Inc. (Symbol: LNG) saw options trading volume of 13,428 contracts, representing approximately 1.3 million underlying shares or approximately 59% of LNG's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.3 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $57.50 strike call option expiring March 16, 2018 , with 11,013 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.1 million underlying shares of LNG. Below is a chart showing LNG's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $57.50 strike highlighted in orange:
And Dell Technologies Inc (Symbol: DVMT) saw options trading volume of 11,291 contracts, representing approximately 1.1 million underlying shares or approximately 56.7% of DVMT's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.0 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $75 strike put option expiring March 16, 2018 , with 3,361 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 336,100 underlying shares of DVMT. Below is a chart showing DVMT's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $75 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for CVGW options , LNG options , or DVMT options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
