Among the underlying components of the S&P 500 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in ABIOMED, Inc. (Symbol: ABMD), where a total of 3,506 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 350,600 underlying shares. That amounts to about 43.3% of ABMD's average daily trading volume over the past month of 810,560 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $230 strike put option expiring May 17, 2019 , with 557 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 55,700 underlying shares of ABMD. Below is a chart showing ABMD's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $230 strike highlighted in orange:
Etrade Financial Corporation (Symbol: ETFC) saw options trading volume of 9,105 contracts, representing approximately 910,500 underlying shares or approximately 42.6% of ETFC's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.1 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $30 strike put option expiring January 17, 2020 , with 1,116 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 111,600 underlying shares of ETFC. Below is a chart showing ETFC's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $30 strike highlighted in orange:
And Becton, Dickinson & Co (Symbol: BDX) saw options trading volume of 5,614 contracts, representing approximately 561,400 underlying shares or approximately 40.9% of BDX's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.4 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $230 strike put option expiring April 18, 2019 , with 2,013 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 201,300 underlying shares of BDX. Below is a chart showing BDX's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $230 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for ABMD options , ETFC options , or BDX options , visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today's Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
