Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Yeti Holdings Inc (Symbol: YETI), where a total of 5,778 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 577,800 underlying shares. That amounts to about 46.7% of YETI's average daily trading volume over the past month of 1.2 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $50 strike call option expiring August 07, 2020, with 1,702 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 170,200 underlying shares of YETI. Below is a chart showing YETI's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $50 strike highlighted in orange:
Charter Communications Inc (Symbol: CHTR) options are showing a volume of 3,619 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 361,900 underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 46.2% of CHTR's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 784,015 shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $600 strike call option expiring August 07, 2020, with 435 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 43,500 underlying shares of CHTR. Below is a chart showing CHTR's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $600 strike highlighted in orange:
And Waters Corp. (Symbol: WAT) options are showing a volume of 3,067 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 306,700 underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 45.4% of WAT's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 675,280 shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $195 strike call option expiring August 21, 2020, with 639 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 63,900 underlying shares of WAT. Below is a chart showing WAT's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $195 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for YETI options, CHTR options, or WAT options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
