Net 1 UEPS Technologies Inc (UEPS) Q3 2019 Earnings Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Net 1 UEPS Technologies Inc (NASDAQ: UEPS)
Q3 2019 Earnings Call
May. 10, 2019, 8:00 a.m. ET


  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:


Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Net 1 Third Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. There will be an opportunity to ask questions later during the conference. (Operator Instructions) Please note that this call is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Dhruv Chopra. Please go ahead, sir.

Dhruv Chopra -- Head of Investor Relations

Thank you, Irene. Welcome to our Third Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. With me on the call today is our CEO, Herman Kotze and our CFO, Alex Smith. Our press release and supplementary financial presentation are available on our Investor Relations website, As a reminder, during this call, we will be making forward-looking statements and I ask you to look at the cautionary language contained in our press release regarding the risks and uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements.

In addition, during this call, we will be using certain non-GAAP financial measures and we have provided a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. We will discuss our results in South African rand which is a non-GAAP measure. We analyze our results of operations in our press release in rand to assist investors in understanding the underlying trends of our business. As you know, the Company's results can be significantly impacted by currency fluctuations between the US dollar and the South African rand. We will have a Q&A session following our prepared remarks.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Herman.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thank you, Dhruv, and good day to everybody. This morning, I will review our third quarter highlights and specifically, the progress on the key focus areas we highlighted on the last call and where we go from here. Following that, Alex will review the third quarter results in more detail, which will be followed by your questions.

Net 1 went through transformational changes during Q3 2019, as we implemented a comprehensive restructuring of our business and cost base. We are on target to complete the two main objectives we set ourselves following the mass migration of our EPE account holder base in Q2. The first being to achieve cash flow breakeven on a monthly basis in our South African operations with effect from June 2019 and going forward and second, to deleverage our balance sheet by settling the significant liabilities related to the DNI transaction earn-out payment and to early settle our long-term loans to RMB which was accomplished last week through the additional 8% sale of DNI. The major part of our cost reduction initiative was the inevitable retrenchment of a significant component of our South African employee base, approximately 2,500 staff members or 50% of the workforce in total. It is particularly painful to execute such a massive retrenchment program during the difficult economic environment in South Africa which is also struggling with a persistently high unemployment rates and the negative impact on staff morale has been palpable.

We are now hopefully past the darkest times in our recent history and we are focused on rebuilding the Group in all respects. Our remaining transaction-related businesses continue to operate broadly in line with our expectations and provide a substantial source of EBITDA to the Group. With the sale of a majority interest in DNI, we now need to exclude its contribution to Group EBITDA, though we will continue to receive dividend payments pertaining to our remaining 50% holding which we believe should also be considered as part of the Group's cash generation.

As of March 31, 2019, we had net cash of $24 million and remain comfortable with the Group's liquidity position over the next 12 months. As we announced earlier in the week, we have commenced with various actions to monetize our investment in DNI. It started with the 17% stake in March followed by a 17.6% sale to RMB this week to early settle our long-term debt and we have agreed to a cool option for our remaining 50% stake.

This option is valid until December 31, 2019 and has a strike price that values our remaining stake at approximately $59 million. DNI is a great business with a solid management team and we will continue to work with them on a commercial basis to realize many of the synergies we've identified over the course of our relationship. The settling of our long-term debt removes the covenants that thus far had prevented us from repurchasing shares, should we be able to monetize our remaining stake in DNI, we would have sufficient liquidity to commence share repurchases under our existing authorization.

Selling our stake in DNI is not one of our holistic strategic review where we are looking to monetize non-strategic assets and focus on our core-centric (ph) business lines. Last quarter, I introduced the four geographic pillars that underpins our strategy. Before I delve into this however, I want to provide some key updates on our South African operations as the stability first and then turn around is a key component of the near-term earnings power of the Company. The notable trends for our South African operations include first, active EPE accounts remain stable at approximately $1.1 million and has maintained these levels since November 2018.

Second, our microlending book increased modestly from Q2, 2019 and that dates are closer to historical levels. Smart Life Insurance played catch up to the EPE auto migration during Q3, 2019 with an increase in balance debit orders, but performance of the remaining policies has since also returned close to the historical range. Third, we issued our first UEPS/EMV cards with Finbond early in Q4, 2019 and we expect a larger scale commercial launch in Q1, 2020 which is September 2019 and when we expect to see our account base starts to grow again, first, we continue to see demand for our ATM network with approximately 1,306 ATMs currently. Third-parties have begun to express interest in us, the growing ATMs for them and could potentially add a further 300 plus ATMs to our network.

And finally, our EasyPay processing business continues to grow nicely, driven by more payment transactions or payments, mobile airtime sales and the merchant acquiring business. As I mentioned earlier, we are on track to be operating at breakeven EBITDA level by the end of Q4 2019 and beyond in the South African business unit.

Let me now turn to our four pillars. I have already covered some of the key developments in South Africa but will highlight additional key developments in our first pillar. Our EPE and its related financial and value-added services businesses includes EPE consumer bank accounts, Moneyline microlending services, Smart Life micro insurance and our mobile ATM network and its roots stem from the infrastructure we have built up over the last 20 years to deliver the services to the grant beneficiary base.

With Finbond, we have stepped up our collaboration efforts with them to address the opportunity of providing banking, financial and other services to the millions of unbanked and under-banked people of South Africa and will not be limited to social grant beneficiaries. We issued our first Finbond UEPS/EMV in a pilot in early Q4, 2019 and expect a wider commercial launch next quarter. Providing low-cost credit is a key differentiator in being able to establish banking relationships with consumers. To that effect we have also begun discussions with our third-party lenders including Finbond to leverage their balance sheet and use our distribution.

The return on these loans would be lower for us, but so too (ph) would be the risk. We are actively managing our distribution infrastructure including ATMs and last quarter relocated 50 ATMs to higher traffic locations. We have also been able to expand our branch infrastructure by deploying low cost and movable containers whose cost is a quarter of that of a fixed branch. We obviously had a challenging second half of 2018 due to a soft macro environment and higher costs for transitioning out of the old network sharing arrangement with Vodacom to a new one with ATM.

The current focus is on managing the short-term liquidity and the Company is actively engaged with the Buffet consortium to close its proposed investment which will significantly reduce its debt servicing costs. Lastly on SASSA, there when we have not been involved operationally with SASSA since September 2018. There are a few outstanding end of contract issues that are yet to be resolved. The two primary areas related to the fees payable to us for the last six months of our contract and the legality of the auto migration of our EPE customers. Both issues are yet unresolved, but we are actively working with SASSA and through the quotes, to put these issues behind us as soon as we can and focus our energies on our businesses going forward.

Moving on to our second pillar, which is Africa. In Africa, depending on the country, only 10% to 30% of the adult populations have access to financial services and that's the deployment of cloud-based card and mobile-based solutions together with strong local partners remains a substantial opportunity for us. Today, we are operational in Namibia and Botswana. We have footholds in nine other countries through our VTU offering in partnership with MTN. We have UEPS as a national payment system in Ghana, a rapidly growing consumer finance operation in Nigeria through OneFi and our six month old QR-based payment initiatives through that Zap Group, Africa.

We have also actively stepped up the cooperation between our different businesses and investments to maximize the potential and accelerate time to market. Zap Group has made significant strides in its second quarter of existence. During Q2 2019, Zap Group had signed up the largest bank in Ghana and went live with a beta product. During Q3 2019, Zap Group is live with its offering for the bank and has also signed up two of the three largest mobile operators in the country. They have also integrated with the largest merchant network allowing them to reach 25,000 merchants. We have also introduced them to GIBS which is the Central Bank switch and runs UEPS to dramatically increase its involvement in the National Payment System. Zap Group has also commenced activities to sign customer contracts in Nigeria and is working closely with us and One Finance.

Lastly, given the success of its digital lending product, OneFi has launched an expanded product, now called Carbon, which enhances its offering as a full fledged digital financial services platform that offers bill payments, fund transfers, and savings in addition to loans. OneFi continues to be a market leader in the digital lending space and disbursed $10 million across 150,000 loans during Q3 and processed 300,000 transactions on the Carbon platform during that period.

The third pillar is Europe and Asia excluding KSNET. This pillar is driven primarily through the International Payments Group or IPG, restructuring and reorganization of IPG is now complete with Malta having become the centralized operation of our international activities. IPG's new court issuing and merchant acquiring platforms have been certified. As part of Visa's merger with Visa Europe, Bank Frick is required to undergo recertification with Visa which is currently under way. Once completed by Q1 2020. IPG can begin the deployment of its new products to the European SME market. During Q3 2019, IPG also secured approval from the Mauritian regulators to become a principal member of China UnionPay for international issuing and acquiring. This approval is being shared with UnionPay and we are awaiting their authorization. We are very excited about the progress made with a development of our revolutionary crypto asset storage product and we are diligently working on commercializing the technology, scaling up production and finalizing the go-to-market launch strategy.

Bank Frick continues to develop its capacity and expertise in relation to cryptocurrency and block chain technology. It has expanded its headcount over 50% in the last year and therefore its calendar 2018 performance was slightly lower than anticipated which was largely due to investments in expanding headcount and improving systems. Bank Frick continues to work closely with IPG regarding our acquiring, processing and cryptocurrency storage solution initiatives. Our virtual core project with MobiKwik has continued to demonstrate steady growth given the constraints applied by our current issuing bank partner. However as a result of new regulatory guidelines MobiKwik has applied for direct membership with Visa and once finalized will allow us to expand issuance to its millions of customers.

MobiKwik itself has performed well in advance of expectations driven primarily due to the successful transition to being a digital financial services provider. During the year ended March 31, 2019, MobiKwik has more than doubled its revenue and has been contribution margin positive since October 2018 and maintains momentum to reach breakeven in its current financial year. MobiKwik disbursed around $17 million across 110,000 loans during Q3 and processed GMV in excess of $700 million for its 79 million users and digital financial services now account for approximately 25% of its total monthly revenue from zero a year ago.

Our fourth pillar is Korea, KSNET specifically. Q3 is traditionally KSNET's weakest quarter. For Q3, KSNET's revenues declined in constant currency primarily driven by lower values and volumes processed during the quarter. EBITDA margins decreased to 17.3% from 18.2% in Q3 2018 mainly driven by lower margin revenue. However operating margin during Q3, 2019 improved significantly to 4.4% from 2% last year as a result of lower depreciation and amortization as CapEx levels have declined in the last two years and certain intangibles have been fully amortized. As we discussed previously we appointed an external advisor to assist with the acceleration of top line growth and improving profitability. We completed the first phase of this engagement during Q3 and identified several key initiatives which will now be implemented by the KSNET management team and we will update you on the progress made as these initiatives start contributing toward our goal of achieving a $40 million EBITDA run rate by Q4, 2020.

In parallel, the Board is engaged with a financial advisor to assist us with the identification of strategic alternatives. These types of activities are complex and time consuming and we expect to be in a better position to comment on the potential outcomes when we report our year-end results. Turning to our investment portfolio, I want to highlight that our remaining equity investment in DNI is now also reflected in the value of our investment portfolio, the total of which is recorded at $323 million or $5.68 per share on our balance sheet. Net 1 has already taken a number of steps in its transition to being a leading fintech provider to the undeserved individuals and businesses in emerging and developed countries alike.

We have undergone an extraordinary period, but we have remained dedicated to our vision and our stakeholders. We expect our operation in Q4 to be relatively stable and return to top and bottom line growth in fiscal 2020.

Alex will now go over the financial performance and metrics in more detail before opening it up for Q&A.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Thank you, Herman, and good day to everybody. I'll be discussing the key results and trends within our operating segments for the third quarter of fiscal 2019 compared to a year ago. For Q3 of 2019 our average rand dollar exchange rate was ZAR14.17 compared to ZAR11.95 a year ago which adversely impacted our US dollar based results by approximately 19%. Our fundamental earnings per share declined to a loss of $0.62 which includes $0.44 of non-cash negative impact from the fair value adjustments for Cell C and the impairment of the Cedar Cell note.

Operationally, the fundamental loss was caused by the losses incurred by our South African operations and at IPG. At the end of the quarter we disposed 17% of DNI which changed DNI from a subsidiary to an equity accounted investment from that date. The results of DNI have been consolidated into our Sanoperations for the third quarter but will move into earnings from equity accounted investments in the fourth quarter. Given the disposal transactions which I will discuss later and the call option has been granted on our remaining DNI investment. We have classified DNI as a discontinued operation for disclosure purposes, to provide shareholders with a view of the performance of the remaining business. By segment South African transaction processing reported revenue of $17.4 million in the third quarter of 2019 down 72% compared to the third quarter of 2018 on a constant currency basis.

The decrease is primarily due to the termination of the SASSA contract and to a lesser extent the reduction in the number of EPE accounts. Our revenue and operating income was also adversely impacted by the significant reduction in the number of SASSA grant recipients with SASSA branded Grindrod cards linked to Grindrod bank accounts as SASSA complete to list position to South African Post Office. These decreases and revenue and operating income were partially offset by higher transaction revenue as a result of increased usage of our ATMs and higher volumes at EasyPay.

Our operating margin for the third quarter of 2019 and 2018 was negative 74.6% and 17.3% respectively. Excluding restructuring costs, the operating loss margin for the third quarter of 2019 was a negative 57.5%. International transaction processing generated revenue of $34.4 million in the third quarter of 2019 which was down 12% compared with the third quarter of 2018 primarily due to a contraction in IPG transactions processed specifically meaningfully lower cryptoexchange and China processing, and modestly lower KSNET revenue as a result of lower transaction values processed.

Operating margin of 5.6% in Q3 2019 was stronger than the reported negative 32.2% margin in the third quarter of 2018, however excluding goodwill impairment and ad hoc tax refund, segment operating income and margin for Q3 2018 were $2.4 million and 5.2%, respectively. For the third quarter of 2019, KSNET's revenue decreased 13% in Korean won to $36.1 million, while EBITDA margin decreased to 17.3% from 18.2% in third quarter of 2018. The remainder of fluid regulatory environment that the management team are implementing various actions to improve profitability and are progressing their move to increase the direct distribution channel. KSNET's cash conversion remains good, with capital investment remaining low.

IPG had another very challenging quarter as transaction volume remained low. There was a small reduction in the losses. Included in the loss is $300,000 of development costs in respect of our new crypto assets storage product. We expect a gradual improvement in the performance of IPG in the coming quarters as it looks to grow the top line particularly as European operations and its various growth initiatives start to materialize.

Financial inclusion and applied technologies generated revenue of $36.7 million in the third quarter of 2019 which was down 27% compared to the third quarter of 2018, primarily due to fewer prepaid airtime and value added services sales, lower lending and insurance revenue, and a decrease in intersegment revenues, partially offset by the inclusion of DNI. Operating margin was 8.8% compared to the 25.1% in the third quarter of 2018. Operating income for this operating segment for the third quarter of fiscal 2019 included retrenchment costs of $1.6 million excluding the retrenchment costs, segment operating income and margin for the third quarter of 2019 were $4.8 million and 13.1%, respectively.

Active EPE accounts remained steady at $1.1 million through the third quarter and these numbers have been stable through the April and May payment cycles. As a result of the stability in the EPE account base, we have also seen performance of our loan book return to more normal levels. Following the substantial write-offs of the last quarter, the book has halved in value. Due to our strict credit criteria, we have not seen any real growth in the number of loans over the quarter.

Default levels are now broadly in line with historical trends and we believe we are conservatively provided against the current book. Smart Life has seen a similar trend as Moneyline, both slightly delayed as their policies have a four-month grace period before lapsing. This meant that a significant portion of that lapse is due to the auto migration to the South African Post Office only crystallized during the third quarter of 2019, but the policyholder base has now stabilized at around 230,000 lives. Smart Life is now focused on rebuilding its customer base and is developing new products both for the beneficiary and broader markets in order to achieve growth.

Our corporate expenses increased primarily due to a $5.3 million impairment loss related to DNI as well as higher acquired intangible asset amortization, non-employee director expenses, transaction related expenditures and external service provider fees. We carry our investment in Cell C at fair value and fluctuations in its carrying value from reporting period -- to reporting period are expected. During Q3 2019, we recorded a non-cash fair value adjustment of $26.3 million which adversely impacted our results. A valuation methodology has remained unchanged and the decline in fair value is attributable to lower EBITDA Cell C with the market multiples of the peer group of eight African and emerging market mobile telecoms operators broadly similar to what we saw in the last quarter. The weaker trading performance of Cell C reflects the difficult trading conditions in the South African consumer market as well as inflated costs associated with their network sharing arrangements.

We also had to impair the carrying value of the Cedar Cellular notes in line with this reduction in the fair value. By third quarter 2019 net interest expense was $4.5 million compared to net interest income of $2.7 million in the comparative quarter. This movement was due to reduced cash balances in the business compared to a year ago due to the substantial losses incurred over the last six months as well as the cost of funding of our ATMs. We recognized losses from equity accounted investments of $0.5 million during the third quarter of 2019 compared to earnings of $4 million in the same period last year.

The reduction from the comparative period is primarily due to the fact that DNI did not contribute to equity income in this quarter as the business was consolidated for the quarter. Following our recent disposal which I'll discuss in more detail later DNI will be equity accounted for the fourth quarter 2019. We expect the contribution from our equity accounts and investments to be positive on an annual basis as it is impacted by the timing of reported results of various investments. At March 31, 2019, our unrestricted cash was approximately $48.8 million compared to $70 million at the end of December. The decrease in our cash balances from the last financial year end was primarily due to significantly weaker trading activities, scheduled debt repayments, dividend payments to non-controlling interests and capital expenditures. These were partially offset by the contribution from the inclusion of DNI and a decrease in our South African lending book.

We had short term banking facilities available to us in various territories of $32.4 million (ph) at 31 March 2019, $8.9 million of which had been utilized. As of March 31,2019, we had restricted cash of $74.2 million, an associated short term facilities utilized of $74.2 million. We have in place, short term credit facilities of ZAR1.75 billion or $121 million specifically to fund our ATMs in South Africa and have presented cash drawn under these facilities and in the processing system has restricted cash on the balance sheet. Free cash flow utilization for the quarter amounted to $15.7 million which included $5.3 million investment into working capital. On March 31, we reduced our shareholding in DNA from 55% to 38% selling the 17% stake to the existing the DNI minority shareholders to ZAR400 million.

This amount was used to settle the deferred purchase obligation due under the terms of the DNI investment. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on May 3rd, 2019, we concluded the sale of a further 7.6% of DNI to RMB. The ZAR215 million of proceeds were used to settle along with ZAR15 million of cash resources, long term debt of ZAR230 million, that was outstanding as of March 31, 2019. Following the second transaction, there is no term debt left on the Group's balance sheet. While we are now debt free from a term debt perspective and have $24 million of net cash on the balance sheet we have liquidity requirements in the short term that constrain our ability to commit resources to share buybacks.

In particular there are working capital funding requirements in respect of, instrumental cash flows in all of the businesses. We need to continue funding the international operations and the South African operations as they return to profitability and we have some new product launches and some operational requirements on growth opportunities in some of the South African business units.

However on the occurrence of a liquidity event such as the disposal of the remaining DNI investment, this will create capacity for share buybacks. Our third quarter 2019 tax benefit was $2.5 million compared to an expense of $19.4 million in the third quarter of 2018. Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2019 has been significantly impacted by impairments and the losses incurred by certain South African businesses, as we have effectively not recorded the deferred tax asset benefits related to the net operating losses. Our effective tax rate will continue to be heavily distorted by losses incurred by certain of our businesses until we return the affected operations to at least a breakeven position.

Our actual and weighted average share count for each of March 31, 2019 and Q2 2019 was 56.8 million shares. Looking forward to Q4, we have to note that DNI will no longer be consolidated into our results and will therefore not contribute to reported EBITDA in Q4. Excluding DNI we expect an adjusted EBITDA loss of $3 million in the fourth quarter which would continue to show sequential improvement if DNI's contribution is excluded from the third quarter. We feel -- we have made significant progress in the last quarter toward achieving our aim of eliminating the significant EBITDA losses in the South African operations by the end of the fourth quarter of 2019.

And once this is achieved we can change our focus to rebuilding the business of the stable base particularly if we also have available capital to exploit opportunities that have already been identified. Internationally, we are excited by some of the product launches and administered that should materialize over the coming months which we expect to result in IPG returning to profitability during the next fiscal year while KSNET should start to see some benefits from the current business and strategic review. These factors should combine to provide a positive outlook for the 2020 fiscal year.

We can now open up the call for Q&A.

Questions and Answers:


Thank you, sir. (Operator Instructions) Our first question is from Allen Klee of Maxim Group.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Yes. Hello. For your South Africa businesses there's a lot of moving parts, can you give us a sense of where you feel once it stabilizes kind of what a run rate we are on potentially revenue and profitability and to what extent in terms of the EPE related and the network fees that you do believe you can grow those businesses more specific on the EPE that you can do that without getting impacted negatively at all by anything related to SASSA. Thank you.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thanks, Allen. A multifaceted question. I'll comment on the part of it now. I'll let Alex comment on the numeric aspect of it. I think it's important to recognize that going forward, toward you know sort of the end of Q4 and bearing in mind that we are already halfway through the fourth quarter. We certainly see a stabilization of the core South African businesses. We certainly do not expect any further major fluctuations other than the remaining issues that we have with SASSA, you know and we'll deal with those as and when they take place. There are some legal processes in place. There are some negotiations in place, but as and when those are concluded will obviously keep you up-to-date. So the focus going forward for us in South Africa is really to continue with the buildout of our EasyPay Everywhere account holder base, and that we want to do in conjunction with Finbond which is you know one of our portfolio companies.

We obviously, in conjunction with that want to focus on the rollout of our financial services offerings including the microlending part of things, the insurance part of things and other value-added services. And of course connected to all of that is the continued rollout and utilization of our point of sale in ATM network. And so if you put all of these things together we're certainly aiming to stabilize the business and to return it to the kind of utilization levels and growth levels that we had seen prior to the whole with the homes EPE accounts.

But I think the other important part of that I would like you to note is that, the offering that we're putting together from a financial services point of view for our EPE account holders both current and looking forward is not only limited to what used to be our target base of grant recipients. Our products are now targeted to a much broader base of South Africans. We see significant opportunities in also addressing the needs of the so-called underserved or under-banked markets. So these are people who are employed and have bank accounts, but who are probably not too happy with the service that they have or access to financial services that they've received, given that those accounts are normally highly restricted in terms of access to financial services and the cost of the financial services that we've made available to those people. So those are the key focus areas for us going forward.

Alex, if you want to give us an indication of where we think a sustainable revenue flow is, please.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

I don't know, it's certainly, in terms of, if you look at the third quarter numbers and strip out the impact of DNI, we have certainly seen revenue on a monthly basis fairly stable. So for the next quarter that would be approximately about $70 million. As we said that we're trying to stabilize to a neutral breakeven EBITDA position at that level, so we would look to be seeing growth into 2020 which would move the revenue line with a dropdown into the EBITDA number given quite a substantial fixed cost base. So, a lot of contribution would drop directly to bottom line.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you. And then moving to your international area for -- two things. One on KSNET, the revenues are down 13% constant currency or 12% in US dollars. So it seems like there's things going on there. I guess it's the regulatory side, but it doesn't seem like it's turned around yet. I'm not really sure what this review is doing or that's changing that, but at one point you thought you could get to a $40 million EBITDA next fiscal year, that seems like a stretch at this point, but maybe if you could give us something on to understand that a little better. And then the rest of IPG, it sounds like, because you're reading for Bank Frick to get approval for related SME lending that maybe we don't think that that can become potentially turning around until calendar 2020. Let me know if those things -- if that's a true statement or something about that, right. Thank you.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Okay. So let's start with KSNET side of things. Allen, so I think from the outset, Q3 is a notoriously difficult quarter, historically as well as this year from a seasonality point of view to used as an actual benchmark. There is a lot of things happening during the third quarter of every fiscal year. We have a number of holidays. There are all sorts of extraneous factors like the weather that plays a role, the timing of the lunar New Year holidays et cetera. So just keep that at the back of your mind when looking at Q3 specifically. But I think the key takeaways for us from the last quarter is, yes, there was a reduction in the values and the volumes processed. There is some impact if you do the year-on-year comparison in terms of how the fees are now calculated, where some of it was previously done on a volume basis that has changed over to a value basis.

But I think the important elements to bear in mind is that there was actual growth in the operating margin levels of the business for the quarter. And second, if we look at the initiatives that are currently under way following this fairly exhaustive review of the current business and the opportunities that have presented themselves to us. There are -- you know, I think three or four main areas that we will be focusing on, in the next couple of quarters going forward. And some of these have a shorter term impact than others, but I think, the key takeaways for us and without giving away too much of our business strategy, we are busy with an extensive review of the current customer base.

You know, it's no secret that following the fee cuts over the last two years and the changes in the way that our revenues are calculated, there are certain aspects or pockets of the business that are not necessarily as profitable as they could be. And we are looking to right size those by doing the appropriate analysis. So bearing in mind that we do have 250,000 merchants as customers. This is obviously quite an intensive exercise to run through. We are then looking at specific direct marketing initiatives. KSNET historically has been very reliant on an agent network that in itself has some cost implications that we are addressing, then we are focusing on growing our niche businesses, in KSNET, those are banking than payment gateway and finally the working capital finance businesses.

So those will form the basis of our focus and activities going forward and will in the end result in what we believe is still an achievable EBITDA run rate of around $40 million toward the end of calendar 2020. So that's the run rate that we have placed in our crosses. So that's the target where we want to end up toward the end of fiscal 2020. In terms of IPG, important to note as you've mentioned that a lot of what has been done and all the preparation and all of the pipe -- sales pipeline that has been built is absolutely dependent on the ability for Bank Frick to be recertified by Visa. In order for IPG to operate as a payment facilitator, we need to get that audit and that process out of the way. We believe that, that process will be done in the next few months, you know, it's literally a matter of just getting the Visa cards to do the work and to give us a certification. So, as soon as that is done we will be able to on-board our first merchants we will be able to issue cards and we'll be able to execute and implement the entire business plan which is focused on the SME business segment within the European space. And so we expect to see a rapid improvement in the contribution and the overall revenues and profitability as soon as we can get that certification out of the way.

Having said that, I also need to just tell you that there's obviously not a single point of failure, we are also exploring and initiating other banks as potential gateways or partners for our European issuing and acquiring strategy. And so if you bundle up that together with obviously the new product launches, and that we have targeted for the next three to six months, we believe that there will be a major improvement in IPG during -- already during calendar 2019, but specifically for its contribution during fiscal 2020.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Can I ask another question?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Yeah. Sure.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Great. What would have the EBITDA loss been in the quarter if you excluded the DNI contribution?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

I think if you excluded the DNI contribution entirely...

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

You will -- I think, because you said that you would -- the loss would be $3 million next quarter, and you said that that would be an improvement over what it was so this quarter, it was $1 million loss, but what would have been, let's say, if you -- so we can look at like apples-to-apples?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Yeah. Sure. So DNI basically contributed EBITDA of $8.4 million in the quarter, so the loss would have been $9.4 million. Yeah. And that's based on the 100% of DNI. The guidance we gave in the -- for this quarter, the $5 million loss basically included 65% of DNI's EBITDA. So we were basically directly in line with what, where we guided on the EBITDA line.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you very much.


Our next question is from Scott Buck, Riley FBR.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Good morning, guys. First congrats on the progress to date. I was hoping you might be able to provide some sort of color around what you view as a strategic or I know you use the term core fintech business on the announcement earlier in the week. I just wanted to get a sense of rather than trying to read the tea leaves. What maybe this business looks like once you shed some of these additional investments and non-strategic business funds.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Okay. Hi, Scott. The strategic review is a process that's obviously quite complex and time consuming and it's one that is currently under way. As we indicated, you know, the core focus for us is really the fintech side of our business. In the South African environment that really revolves around our EPE offering and the related financial services around that. So that, you know, the technology the tech thought of fintech would be the rollout of our UEPS/EMV platform and the fin part of the fintech would be the offering of financial services. So that includes loans, insurance and value added services, prepaid, airtime, utilities et cetera, et cetera.

The same thing, I think, would apply to the IPG business. Obviously a key part of what we need to consider as part of this review is what the market ability and value of any of the potential non-core assets would be. And so that is an exercise that we are currently doing. It is, we are assisted by some very capable and competent advisors in this regard. But you know, I think as a key takeaway, the financial technology elements of the business are ones that we consider core and the others are probably on the list of non-core assets. And once we have made our final decisions and we've mapped out a plan in terms of how we potentially could realize some of the non-core assets, we will let you know, but this is by no means a fire sale or a dissolving of the Company. We want to do this very properly and we want to make sure that we end up with what we believe is going to be the absolute core focus of the business going forward.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Great. I appreciate the color there. Second, how confident are you in that DNI will exercise the call option?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Well, you know, obviously we would not have granted this option for the period that we have, unless we had some, I think indication that the likelihood or the probability of the exercise was something that could happen, structuring these options and putting together all the legals is also fairly complex and quite time consuming. And the fact that we went to the effort of doing so, I think indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that the option will be exercised. I know for a fact that there are a number of interested parties -- the business is a fantastic cash generative business. It is highly attractive to any potential investor in that market space. And we've given ourselves that we've given the other side until December to do so. So, I wouldn't want to stick my neck out on exactly what the timing would be. But I do think that it's highly likely that the option will be exercised.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Great. Thank you. Last one, what kind of timeline can we expect in terms of additional announcements like this, you know, are we talking months, quarters, years, probably all of the above?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Probably all of the above. Some of these...

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst


Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Are shorter term and initial terms, and some of them are a lot easier to execute. Again it's all a function of you know when you look at the strategic review there is a function of market ability, valuation and interested parties. When you look at the product side of things, I think that there will be a lot more being announced rather in a matter of months than years. But we will obviously keep you fully abreast of any developments and we will announce any of these transactions as and when they take place.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Perfect. One more, I'll add, guys. Are there any additional significant cash outlays in regards to you know further retrenchment costs expected during the fourth quarter? I know you have kind of laid out, you know, what some of the cash requirements are for the business, but kind of outside of that any outsized cash requirements here in Q4?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

There may be a few more restructuring costs, but we're not talking about outsized ones, more routine.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst


Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Yeah. I think we're largely complete.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst


Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

It's staying up over all the loose ends now. But by and large, I think we're nowhere close to expecting what we've seen in Q3 which was the absolute sort of authorship (ph) quarter as far as, as those costs were concerned.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Perfect. Thank you, guys.


Our next question is from Josh Raizin of Cedar Street (ph).

Joshua Raizin -- Cedar Street Asset Management -- Analyst

Hi. Thank you for taking my question, and congratulations on the process that you've made. You went from a pretty rapid shift between buying majority position in DNI and now you're looking to sell that entire position. Could you talk about the strategic shift there? How does it affect the strategy to bundle financial products with Cell C starter packs and what does it imply for the investment in Cell C. Thanks.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Sure. Josh, we obviously went through the initial acquisition as you say of DNI. That then was increased to a control position toward the end of last year. I think squarely as a result of the events that took place over the October to February period and the dramatic impact that it had on the South African business, we obviously had to take a long and hard and fresh look at exactly what we needed to focus on. We needed to understand what we could do to resolve the pretty dire situation that we had found ourselves in. And obviously as I -- as I've said before, exactly what the core focus of the business will be going forward.

DNI is a fantastic business as I've said from a profitability and a cash generation point of view. It's got a fabulous management team and it is very much involved on the telecom side of things. It has a distribution network that we believe is complementary to the one that we have built up. But you know after we did the full analysis of where we wanted to go and how we could rapidly resolve the situation that we could -- that we found ourselves in, we also took into account which businesses we would be able to work together with -- without necessarily being a majority shareholder in that specific business. And so DNI fell squarely into that bracket.

We know that we have the ability to continue to work with the management team in DNI to rollout the products and services that we had identified. As far as Cell C is concerned, DNI obviously remains an important distributor for Cell C, so through our shareholding in Cell C we also remain close to the DNI business as a natural progression of our ownership there. I think Cell C is a slightly more complicated investment to deal with. We are a 15% share shoulder in that specific business and over the last couple of months or quarters, we have been giving you an indication of the kinds of issues that Cell C is facing. Cell C itself obviously produces some public results from time to time. And given the current state of affairs at Cell C and the current transactions that are under way, I think, it would not be appropriate for us at this point in time to talk about any potential exit of that investment.

We have always spoken about the liquidity event or the exit event being a IPO or a strategic sale of the business. And so although that's not something that is in the pipeline in the short term of the asset progresses over the medium term. The Cell C management team is on record by stating that they are targeting an IPO toward 2021 or in roughly three years time. That's when we will probably consider the alternatives that we have as far as the Cell C investment is concerned.

Joshua Raizin -- Cedar Street Asset Management -- Analyst

Great. Thank you. And just as a secondary question, I know there was talk of resegmenting the business. Now that you no longer have the software contract, is that still something that you are looking at. And if so when will we expect you to implement it. Thank you.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Yeah. We are still looking at it. We're obviously, as we've indicated, we're going through this strategic review and we think it's appropriate to finalize that first and then look at resegmentation at that point in time. We're still looking at the business as we have done historically at the moment. So it will be driven by this strategic review process.


Our last question is from Allen Klee.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Hi. Sorry. Two questions. I don't have anything to do with each other. First one is, could you give us what the EBITDA would have been in the quarter from the not, kind of what you said last quarter, is it annualized if you excluded the trouble businesses what that would be. And then second could you talk a little bit more about how you think about the value of the network you have in South Africa and the processing fees you get from that, maybe we can understand the value of that. Thank you.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

So I think just on the first question, the EBITDA run rate of the -- of basically the sort of transaction type businesses, so that's KSNET, EasyPay, first and the ATM business, would be in the region of $25 million to $30 million. And then I think, as Herman mentioned, we'd also be looking at receiving the dividend from DNI going forward based on the 30% holding. And that's probably about $4 million of dividend flow annually out of the remaining 30% investment that we have now. So that's all based on Q3 run rate in terms of those four operations that I discussed. So in particular the KSNET net run rate for Q3. And so that's kind of the EBITDA sense.

In terms of how we look at the value of the infrastructure, we obviously see that as critical for the future of the South African business. The a strong infrastructure that's been built over the last 20 years as part of servicing the SASSA contract. We've got significant reach into the South African population and particular into that unbanked and underserviced population. We think we're probably within three miles of most of the South African population and it's really around leveraging the infrastructure and from that we can generate a combination of ATM fees, interchange fees, issuing fees and then the related financial services, particularly, the loans and the insurance products. And then on top of that, I mean having looked about the fact that we can -- would look to continue work with DNI regardless of the state of our -- you know the size of our stake. And so there is also opportunity in terms of leveraging telecoms and lifestyle type products into that mix into the -- into that infrastructure. And all of that you know with a strong network will lead to higher incremental margins as we grow the customer base again.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Thank you.


Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.

Duration: 62 minutes

Call participants:

Dhruv Chopra -- Head of Investor Relations

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR -- Analyst

Joshua Raizin -- Cedar Street Asset Management -- Analyst

More UEPS analysis

All earnings call transcripts

AlphaStreet Logo

10 stocks we like better than Net1 UEPS Technologies
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.* 

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Net1 UEPS Technologies wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 1, 2019

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

In This Story


Latest Markets Videos

The Motley Fool

Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

Learn More