Shutterstock photo
In afternoon trading on Monday, Materials stocks are the best performing sector, up 1.4%. Within that group, CF Industries Holdings Inc (Symbol: CF) and Mosaic Co (Symbol: MOS) are two of the day's stand-outs, showing a gain of 7.1% and 7.0%, respectively. Among the high volume ETFs , one ETF closely following materials stocks is the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLB), which is up 1.0% on the day, and up 10.86% year-to-date. CF Industries Holdings Inc, meanwhile, is down 3.19% year-to-date, and Mosaic Co , is down 16.13% year-to-date. Combined, CF and MOS make up approximately 2.6% of the underlying holdings of XLB.
The next best performing sector is the Energy sector, up 1.1%. Among large Energy stocks, Apache Corp (Symbol: APA) and Noble Energy Inc (Symbol: NBL) are the most notable, showing a gain of 4.7% and 2.7%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Energy stocks is the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF ( XLE ), which is up 0.4% in midday trading, and down 13.52% on a year-to-date basis. Apache Corp, meanwhile, is down 24.83% year-to-date, and Noble Energy Inc, is down 26.64% year-to-date. Combined, APA and NBL make up approximately 2.8% of the underlying holdings of XLE.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Monday. As you can see, five sectors are up on the day, while three sectors are down.
Sector
% Change
Materials
+1.4%
Energy
+1.1%
Technology & Communications
+0.7%
Industrial
+0.5%
Utilities
+0.2%
Financial
0.0%
Consumer Products
-0.2%
Healthcare
-0.4%
Services
-0.5%
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
