Maybe It Wasn’t About the Money – Few People Fell for Twitter Hack, Data Indicates
Even though Wednesdayâs Twitter hack grabbed the worldâs attention by taking over a host of prominent accounts including those belonging to Elon Musk, Uber, Apple and Barack Obama, transaction data for crypto wallets associated with the attacks shows the hackers didnât make out like bandits. It raises the question: Why not?
With the attacks, millions of people saw the same scam-type message shared on their feeds, soliciting bitcoin with the promise it would be doubled and sent to a group called âCrypto for Health.â
Crypto-analytics firm Chainalysis told CoinDesk that it had identified and was monitoring four crypto wallets associated with the attack, three of which received bitcoin and one was for XRP but hadnât received anything by press time.Â
- The most prominent bitcoin address registered 372 incoming bitcoin transactions, and nine withdrawals from the wallet had been made by press time, according to data reviewed by CoinDesk.Â
- The secondary BTC addresses registered a total of 100 transactions and received about $6,700 in bitcoin, Chainalysis said. While over 400 transactions were registered on the wallets in total, the attacks appear to have yielded a relatively marginal amount of $123,200.
- According to Chainalysis, part of the scam relied on the hackers moving their own crypto between the wallets to create the impression that many people were participating in the offer. While 156 wallets appear to have given away more than a $1, itâs difficult to parse which one of the transactions could belong to the hackers.
- Some people were clearly duped, however, with 17 wallets having given away more than $1000, including a Japanese wallet that gave $40,000 away, to a Twitter scam that rivaled in sophistication to an email solicitation from a âNigerian prince.â
- So considering the hackers had access to the Twitter accounts of some of the most influential business people in the world, the lack of sophistication of the bitcoin solicitation may indicate the perpetrators had other goals besides money.
- For instance, the profit from yesterdayâs massive attack contrasts sharply with the more than $240,000 yielded in 2000 from a hack on just one mid-sized tech company.Â
- In that instance, a former employee of a press release distribution company accessed that companyâs system to issue a false release on behalf of Emulex Corp., a networking firm, the shares of which he was short. That release, which purported to disclose financial irregularities at Emulex, cost shareholders about $110 million after the fake news disclosure initially wiped out more than $2 billion off Emulexâs market cap.
- So clearly the effects of Wednesdayâs hacks could have been significantly worse, perhaps even catastrophic.
- Itâs possible yesterdayâs attack was more about the vanity of the hackers rather than any serious attempt to get rich. Or perhaps Michael Caine was right when talking about Heath Ledgerâs character in The Dark Knight; maybe some people do just want to watch the world burn.
- First Mover: Why Bitcoin Traders Couldnât Give a Sat About the Twitter Hack
- Twitter Says Hacker Group Targeted 130 Accounts
- What Does the Twitter Hack Mean for Bitcoin? Crypto Reacts
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.