Lowe's stock has trailed competitor Home Depot 's this year as its key operating metrics lag just behind those of its larger rival. Yet Lowe's is still benefiting from the rising economic tide that's lifting the home improvement market to new highs. That trend was evident in the company's third-quarter earnings results, which it released on Nov. 18.
Here's a big picture look at how Lowe's numbers stacked up against the prior-year period :
Lowe's results: The raw numbers
Q3 2015 Actuals
Q3 2014 Actuals
Source: Lowe's financial filings.
What happened with Lowe's this quarter?
As Home Depot did earlier in the week, Lowe's posted substantial quarterly revenue and earnings gains as shoppers across the country boosted their spending on home improvements. Comparable-store sales growth accelerated from the prior quarter -- and profitability spiked as well.
The key highlights of the third quarter:
- Revenue jumped 5% to $14.4 billion.
- Comps rose 5% -- an improvement from the 4.3% pace that Lowe's set in the second quarter. Yet that result trailed Home Depot's 7.3% comps jump.
- Gross margin ticked higher to 34.75% of sales, on pace with Home Depot's gross profitability.
- Operating margin improved to 8%, but remained well below Home Depot's 14% margin.
- Lowe's returned $1.01 billion of cash to shareholders through $750 million in stock buyback spending and $260 million in dividend payments.
- It affirmed its full-year sales and profit outlook.
- Reiterated plans to open as many as 20 new stores this year.
What management had to say
"This is an exciting time for Lowe's as we continue to execute our strategic priorities alongside a favorable macroeconomic backdrop," said CEO Robert A. Niblock. That happy backdrop involves a home improvement industry that's growing sharply: Spending has jumped to a $600 billion annual pace, up from less than $400 billion three years ago.
Management credited a healthy mix of increased shopper traffic and higher average spending for powering the solid results. "Growth was driven by gains in both transactions and average ticket, while our focus on productivity and profitability also allowed us to deliver strong earnings-per-share growth," Niblock said.
Lowe's didn't provide details on its customer traffic and average ticket results, but we know that they trailed Home Depot's figures. The home improvement giant posted 4.4% customer traffic gains along with a 0.8% uptick in average customer spending, to $58 per trip.
Niblock and his executive team reaffirmed their full-year sales growth outlook that targets comps gains of 4.25% at the midpoint of guidance. Earnings are expected to weigh in at $3.29 per share (up 21% over 2014). Those targets haven't changed since Lowe's first articulated them in February.
In contrast, Home Depot earlier in the week raised its comps forecast for the third consecutive time, saying it believes it will grow by 4.9% in 2015. Its profit outlook has improved as well, rising to a projected $5.36 per share (up 14% from 2014) from the $5.14 per share that it had originally forecast.
The next billion-dollar iSecret
The world's biggest tech company forgot to show you something at its recent event, but a few Wall Street analysts and the Fool didn't miss a beat: There's a small company that's powering their brand-new gadgets and the coming revolution in technology. And we think its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors! To be one of them, just click here .
The article Lowe's Companies Inc. Earnings: Solid Growth, But Still Trailing Home Depot Inc. originally appeared on Fool.com.
Demitrios Kalogeropoulos owns shares of Home Depot. The Motley Fool recommends Home Depot. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Copyright © 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.