It seems like copying Snap (NYSE: SNAP) is all the rage these days. Facebook is easily the most direct competitor to do so, notably with considerable success . Messaging services have been a major battleground for years for the tech heavyweights, including Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) , which acquired Skype for $8.5 billion in 2011. Skype has always been closely associated with video and audio calls, but messaging has evolved quite a bit since the service's inception in 2003.
Microsoft announced a complete redesign of Skype yesterday, and the software giant is the latest to take a page out of Snapchat's playbook.
Copying two Snapchat features
Skype is getting a new interface that heavily emphasizes regular text-based messaging. The new additions, including customizations and a cleaner design aesthetic, are mostly table stakes in 2017. You can now add emotive reactions to any message or video call, as well. The unshakable comparisons to Snapchat come from two specific new features: Capture and Highlights.
Capture takes users to the camera, allowing them to take photos or videos that can then be shared. Users can then add a variety of stickers, text captions, and annotations before being sent, much like Snapchat.
Highlights takes the replication one step farther, and closely resembles Snapchat Stories. Users can organize a series of photos and videos into a specified order before sharing.
It's worth noting what Microsoft is not copying: Snapchat's characteristic ephemerality. There's no mention of disappearing content in the redesigned version.
Why is Microsoft doing this?
The most obvious reason is relevance. As mentioned above, messaging has become a critical strategic aspect of how tech companies attract and retain users, since it's such an important way that people communicate with each other. Skype still feels like an antiquated brand, especially compared with what rivals now have to offer.
Microsoft stopped disclosing Skype monthly connected users in its fiscal Q3 2013. The last tally was over 300 million users in fiscal Q2 2013, adding 50 million monthly connected users over the prior two quarters. Presumably, Microsoft stopped disclosing Skype user metrics because the figures started heading the wrong way.
There's also the fact that the price tag for Skype was utterly massive, and translated into Microsoft recording over $7 billion in goodwill on its balance sheet related to the acquisition. This is from a 10-Q in 2011, after Microsoft finalized the accounting of the deal (emphasis added):
If Microsoft fails to realize Skype's value by "extending Skype's brand and the reach of its networked platform, while enhancing Microsoft's existing portfolio of real-time communications products and services," then that goodwill will need to be impaired, and the company will have to eat a massive one-time charge (recorded on the income statement during the quarter in which it's recognized).
That's a fate that Microsoft wants to avoid.
10 stocks we like better than Microsoft
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor , has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Microsoft wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 1, 2017
Teresa Kersten is an employee of LinkedIn and is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft. Evan Niu, CFA owns shares of FB. Evan Niu, CFA has the following options: long January 2019 $20 puts on Snap Inc. and long January 2018 $120 calls on FB. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends FB. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
