The First of Long Island Corporation (NASDAQ:FLIC) is about to trade ex-dividend in the next three days. This means that investors who purchase shares on or after the 8th of January will not receive the dividend, which will be paid on the 21st of January.
First of Long Island's next dividend payment will be US$0.19 per share, on the back of last year when the company paid a total of US$0.76 to shareholders. Based on the last year's worth of payments, First of Long Island stock has a trailing yield of around 4.3% on the current share price of $17.85. We love seeing companies pay a dividend, but it's also important to be sure that laying the golden eggs isn't going to kill our golden goose! So we need to investigate whether First of Long Island can afford its dividend, and if the dividend could grow.
Dividends are typically paid from company earnings. If a company pays more in dividends than it earned in profit, then the dividend could be unsustainable. That's why it's good to see First of Long Island paying out a modest 44% of its earnings.
Companies that pay out less in dividends than they earn in profits generally have more sustainable dividends. The lower the payout ratio, the more wiggle room the business has before it could be forced to cut the dividend.
Have Earnings And Dividends Been Growing?
Companies with consistently growing earnings per share generally make the best dividend stocks, as they usually find it easier to grow dividends per share. If earnings decline and the company is forced to cut its dividend, investors could watch the value of their investment go up in smoke. This is why it's a relief to see First of Long Island earnings per share are up 8.4% per annum over the last five years.
The main way most investors will assess a company's dividend prospects is by checking the historical rate of dividend growth. In the last 10 years, First of Long Island has lifted its dividend by approximately 7.9% a year on average. It's encouraging to see the company lifting dividends while earnings are growing, suggesting at least some corporate interest in rewarding shareholders.
Should investors buy First of Long Island for the upcoming dividend? First of Long Island has seen its earnings per share grow slowly in recent years, and the company reinvests more than half of its profits in the business, which generally bodes well for its future prospects. We think this is a pretty attractive combination, and would be interested in investigating First of Long Island more closely.
In light of that, while First of Long Island has an appealing dividend, it's worth knowing the risks involved with this stock. For example, we've found 1 warning sign for First of Long Island that we recommend you consider before investing in the business.
We wouldn't recommend just buying the first dividend stock you see, though. Here's a list of interesting dividend stocks with a greater than 2% yield and an upcoming dividend.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
In This StoryFLIC
Latest Nasdaq-Listed Companies Videos
- Is It Time To Consider Buying QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM)?
- With A 4.0% Return On Equity, Is Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:GREE) A Quality Stock?
- Trade Alert: The Independent Director Of Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:GBT), Scott Morrison, Has Sold Some Shares Recently
- Five Star Senior Living (NASDAQ:FVE) shareholders have endured a 81% loss from investing in the stock five years ago